Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.crypt |
| Subject | Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. |
| Date | 2021-09-17 20:46 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <si2urq$srl$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <438ad408-35cb-4e67-968d-9c0b67861b31n@googlegroups.com> <si2glu$3nn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 17.09.21 18:07, austin obyrne wrote:
>> Given that the ciphertext is comprised of groups of 3 x seven-digit
>> integers. It follows that the sample space is of the order of (9
>> factorial)^21 in any attack. This is 362880^21- an enormous number
>> that can even be made emuch larger if needs be.
>
> 9 factorial? I'd like to see that math. Is there any point in your
> cipher where each number from 1 to 9 has to appear exactly once? I
> hope all values are independent from one another.
As with most things that Austin posts, his math is comically wrong.
So, now it is "seven digit integers". Well, "seven digit integers" can
represent 10,000,000 possible numbers.
Now, I switch to some "bc" work to do the math.
Three "seven digit" integers then are:
10000000*10000000*10000000*3
3000000000000000000000
Possible combinations.
Now, define a factorial function (this is direct from the bc manpage):
define f (x) {
if (x <= 1) return (1);
return (f(x-1) * x);
}
And then compute (9 factorial)^21:
f(9)^21
56888396215740878371932195299255658329404794388858314473940721862532\
2895127819048683463338098688000000000000000000000
Hmm, that number is significantly longer than the first. How much
longer (at this size, I'm just letting BC do integer arithmetic, with
numbers this big, no one cares if the answer has a decimal value)?
(f(9)^21)/(10000000*10000000*10000000*3)
18962798738580292790644065099751886109801598129619438157980240620844\
0965042606349561154446032896
So Austin's math is wrong by a factor of 189,627,987,385,802,927,906,\
440,650,997,518,861,098,015,981,296,194,381,579,802,406,208,440,965,\
042,606,349,561,154,446,032,896 times.
Back to sci.crypt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 09:07 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Leo <usenet@gkbrk.com> - 2021-09-17 16:17 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 17:34 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 02:28 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 09:36 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 09:14 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-24 15:14 -0500
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-24 21:57 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 17:23 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 18:44 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 10:11 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 19:32 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 18:43 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 11:04 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 20:14 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 11:35 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 20:49 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 12:09 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 21:30 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 13:39 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 22:44 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 13:55 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-24 15:33 -0500
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 20:42 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 22:25 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 22:56 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 23:11 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 23:53 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-18 00:16 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 00:12 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 01:56 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 10:09 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 02:25 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:57 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 23:03 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 22:47 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:54 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 11:23 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:50 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:46 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 13:56 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 02:41 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 10:55 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 03:34 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-18 12:26 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 14:02 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 06:17 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 14:28 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 14:51 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-18 16:20 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-18 16:18 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 06:24 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 14:31 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 06:44 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 15:20 +0100
csiph-web