Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack.

From	Max <maxturv26@gmx.net>
Newsgroups	sci.crypt
Subject	Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack.
Date	2021-09-17 20:49 +0200
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<si2nut$1i95$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <d4b3bdb9-21b1-465e-ae4c-9afcd319be7dn@googlegroups.com> <si2jeu$1fbv$1@gioia.aioe.org> <9e90a0c8-df42-4883-b2a4-9ddd0199f70cn@googlegroups.com> <si2lv0$kr0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <22751d32-7d5e-43ce-9060-6b0fa3ba4bbdn@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 17.09.21 20:35, austin obyrne wrote:
> On Friday, 17 September 2021 at 19:15:02 UTC+1, Max wrote:
>> On 17.09.21 20:04, austin obyrne wrote:
>>> On Friday, 17 September 2021 at 18:32:18 UTC+1, Max wrote:
>>>> On 17.09.21 19:11, austin obyrne wrote:
>>>> [..]
>>>>>
>>>>> As I see I don't think combinatorics is valid as a method in vector cryptography
>>>>> .- OK in scalar data that have magnitude but not with vectors ( that have direction as well as magnitude).
>>>> You don't use "directions". They are, at best, an "emergent property" of
>>>> your vectors. Your vectors are sufficiently defined by their x, y and
>>>> z-values. As these values are integers, I can easily map them / encode
>>>> them to a single integer (143, 752, 12) simply becomes 143752012.
>>>>
>>>> Still wondering, where do the 9! come from? I think, this is wrong.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AOB
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Max
>>> Each column (of the 7) can be filled in 9! ways i.e. nine factorial ways.
>>> (The possibility space must consider filling all 9 places in every possible way)
>>> There are 7 'columns' => 9^7
>>> There are 3 sets of 7 integers as coefficients of i, j, k => (9!^7) ^3 = 9! ^ 21
>>> in words - nine factorial to the power of twenty one.
>> I asked, where the 9! comes from, not the 21. Why do you think, each
>> column can be filled in 9! ways?
>> If we're talking digits, then each spot in a 7-digit-number can be
>> filled in 10 ways. So, there are 10^7 possible combinations.
>>
>>>
>>> AOB
>>>
>> So, there are 10^7 possible combinations.
> Zero (0) doesn't count anywhere n the first column= > 9 only ways
Yes, it does. Or do you only allow for vector coefficients greater or 
equal to 100? 7 would be 007. Same with all the following digits. 700 is 
a valid value, too.


> - Doesn't happen in my work but you may have a point to argue in other cases
> .- Better settle for 9 all round - hence 9! - agreed ?
No. Even if there were 9 possible values per digit, that would be 
9*9*9*...*9 aka 9^n. 9! would be 9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1, only applicable, if 
each digit in a 9-digit-number would have to be unique and also not 
allowed to be 0.


> 
> AOB
>

Thread

Triangulation Cryptography  - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 09:07 -0700
  Re: Triangulation Cryptography  - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Leo <usenet@gkbrk.com> - 2021-09-17 16:17 +0000
    Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 17:34 +0100
      Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 02:28 -0700
    Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 09:36 -0700
      Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 09:14 -0700
      Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-24 15:14 -0500
        Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-24 21:57 +0000
  Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 17:23 +0100
  Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 18:44 +0200
    Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 10:11 -0700
      Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 19:32 +0200
        Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 18:43 +0100
        Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 11:04 -0700
          Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 20:14 +0200
            Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 11:35 -0700
              Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 20:49 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 12:09 -0700
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 21:30 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 13:39 -0700
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 22:44 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 13:55 -0700
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-24 15:33 -0500
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 20:42 +0100
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 22:25 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 22:56 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 23:11 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 23:53 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-18 00:16 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 00:12 -0700
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 01:56 -0700
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 10:09 +0100
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 02:25 -0700
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:57 +0000
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 23:03 +0200
                Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. wizzofozz <oxxxxxxxxxxxs@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 22:47 +0200
            Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:54 +0000
        Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 11:23 -0700
        Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:50 +0000
    Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:46 +0000
      Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 13:56 -0700
  Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 02:41 -0700
    Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 10:55 +0100
      Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 03:34 -0700
        Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-18 12:26 +0000
          Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 14:02 +0100
            Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 06:17 -0700
              Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 14:28 +0100
              Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 14:51 +0100
              Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-18 16:20 +0000
            Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-18 16:18 +0000
  Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 06:24 -0700
    Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 14:31 +0100
      Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-18 06:44 -0700
        Re: Triangulation Cryptography - Statistical Cryptanalysis Attack. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-18 15:20 +0100

csiph-web