Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #81091
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions |
| Date | 2021-09-08 13:17 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <sha649$6on$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <hOudnfXpudHWjbL8nZ2dnUU7-KHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <sgoj6g$79p$1@dont-email.me> <jEyZI.72921$Kv2.42802@fx47.iad> <sh6m10$q53$1@redfloyd.dont-email.me> <sha2ps$1vkl$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 08/09/2021 12:20, Juha Nieminen wrote: > red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> wrote: >> I don't think so. I believe unsigned rollover is defined. If x was a >> regular long, that's another matter. > > Indeed. Unsigned integers use 2's complement arithmetic as per the standard. > (Well, pratically speaking 2's complement.) > I think I know what you are trying to say, but it is a strange way to say it. "Two's complement" only makes sense for signed integers - it has no meaning for unsigned types. Unsigned types in C and C++ are defined as modulo types. Conventionally, we may say they "wrap on overflow" - but to be more accurate, there is no overflow. The result of adding unsigned ints "a" and "b" is the value of "(a + b) % 2^n" using standard mathematical arithmetic, where "n" is the number of value bits in unsigned int. > It's only with signed integers that overflow and underflow are undefined. Yes. > (And for a reason, as there are architectures where this may cause a fault > signal to be thrown.) > That is perhaps one of several reasons, but it is not the only one. The primary reason, as I see it, is that overflow of signed integer arithmetic will give you the wrong answer. Picking a definition for the result does not make it correct or useful - it merely hinders tools in helping you to find the errors in your code.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Detect Math Errors in Functions Joseph Hesse <joeh@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 07:31 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2021-08-31 23:54 -0700
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 09:30 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2021-09-01 07:53 -0700
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 17:50 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-01 12:28 -0400
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2021-09-01 17:38 +0100
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 09:50 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2021-09-01 16:38 +0100
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 19:25 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Hope Rouselle <hrouselle@jevedi.com> - 2021-09-06 11:04 -0300
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-06 00:20 -0300
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 07:23 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2021-09-06 20:34 -0400
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-01 18:22 +0000
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 21:02 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-02 11:53 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 21:10 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-02 05:31 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-02 07:51 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2021-09-06 20:47 -0400
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-09-06 20:24 -0700
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-08 10:20 +0000
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-08 13:17 +0200
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Hope Rouselle <hrouselle@jevedi.com> - 2021-09-08 10:24 -0300
Re: Detect Math Errors in Functions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-07 09:10 +0200
csiph-web