Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #172222
| From | Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: lynx - not all sites readable |
| Date | 2016-09-15 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <shFd8-7FN-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <shoOZ-5xq-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <shpBn-665-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <shpBn-665-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <shqe5-6km-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <shAwN-4Ih-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Andre Majorel wrote: > > To the OP : both sites (and the links under "Drivers") work with > Elinks as far as I can see. > > I must say, it baffles me that Lynx continues to get more > mentions than Elinks, Links and W3m together even though they > render HTML at least as well and usually better that Lynx. Or > have things changed in recent years ? Actually not as well or better, depending on the task. Lynx is updated regularly, which may be part of why you hear about it with greater frequency. Plug in aspects like html5 in some distributions, the ability to manage script buttons sometimes too if the button is well created . Links is no longer updated, does not even support cookies. e-links has not been updated for a while, while lynx was updated a few months ago. Karen
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
lynx - not all sites readable Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-09-14 22:20 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-09-14 22:30 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-15 01:20 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-15 02:10 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-09-15 08:40 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-15 16:40 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-09-15 16:50 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-15 17:00 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-09-16 02:10 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2016-09-14 23:10 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2016-09-14 23:50 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-09-15 02:10 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Andre Majorel <aym-naibed@teaser.fr> - 2016-09-15 10:50 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-09-15 11:10 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Andre Majorel <aym-naibed@teaser.fr> - 2016-09-15 12:20 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-09-15 18:50 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2016-09-15 12:00 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-09-15 12:40 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> - 2016-09-15 22:40 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-09-16 11:40 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-09-16 12:30 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-15 15:50 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> - 2016-09-15 17:30 +0200
Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-15 22:50 +0200
Re: Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> - 2016-09-16 00:10 +0200
Re: Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-16 01:00 +0200
Re: Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> - 2016-09-16 01:40 +0200
Re: Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-16 02:00 +0200
Re: Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> - 2016-09-16 02:50 +0200
Re: Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-16 04:50 +0200
Re: Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> - 2016-09-16 05:10 +0200
Re: Links browser, was lynx - not all sites readable Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 09:10 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-09-15 14:20 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2016-09-15 16:10 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2016-09-14 23:10 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable emetib <chadbrabec@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 01:40 +0200
Re: lynx - not all sites readable jeremy bentham <dnw@eskimo.com> - 2016-09-16 04:50 +0200
csiph-web