Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #172119
| From | Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Network issue........ |
| Date | 2016-09-13 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sgU4x-18N-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sgPod-6ux-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sgRJp-7Xu-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <sgTLc-11k-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sgU4x-18N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:20:30PM CEST, Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> said: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:07:51AM -0400, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote: > >On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 04:54:08 AM Darac Marjal wrote: > >>On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:26:55PM +1000, Charlie wrote: > >>>Kernel IP routing table > >>>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface > >>>0.0.0.0 10.80.2.85 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > >>>10.80.2.84 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth0 > >> > >>This translates as "For 10.80.2.84 to 10.80.2.87, talk directly to the > >>host, otherwise gateway through 10.80.2.85". > > > >I'm not the OP, but maybe I can learn something. > > > >I can sort of see where you got the 10.80.2.84--oh, and I was going to say > >that I don't see where the 10.80.2.87 came from, but, without doing the math, > >maybe that comes from the 255.255.255.252 netmask? > > Yes. I actually plugged the numbers into http://www.subnet-calculator.com/ > as I'm lazy, but 255.255.255.252 is also written as /2 and it defines a > subnet where everything but the last 2 bits of the address are the same. > We're lucky that, in this instance 10.80.2.84 is on the lower boundary of > this range (Actually, the routing table might enforce that), so the next 4 > (inclusive) hosts make up the range .84 (which would usually be the > 'network' address), .85 and .86 (which are both 'usable' hosts) and .87 > (which would be the 'broadcast' address). That's /30 (30 fixed bits) not /2
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Network issue........ Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2016-09-13 08:30 +0200
Re: Network issue........ Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2016-09-13 11:00 +0200
Re: Network issue........ rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-09-13 13:10 +0200
Re: Network issue........ Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2016-09-13 13:30 +0200
Re: Network issue........ Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2016-09-13 13:30 +0200
Re: Network issue........ Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2016-09-13 13:40 +0200
Re: Network issue........ Fabrizio Carrai <fabrizio.carrai@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 13:10 +0200
Re: Network issue........ Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-09-13 18:00 +0200
Re: Network issue........ Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2016-09-14 01:10 +0200
Re: Network issue........ "Neal P. Murphy" <neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu> - 2016-09-14 01:20 +0200
Re: Network issue........ Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2016-09-14 01:50 +0200
Re: Network issue........ "Neal P. Murphy" <neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu> - 2016-09-14 02:00 +0200
csiph-web