Re: [PATCH 00/15] drivers: net: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module

From	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 00/15] drivers: net: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module
Date	2016-09-13 05:30 +0200
Message-ID	<sgMA1-4pU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sgA5P-4ka-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:03:31 -0400

> This trivial series is similar to [0] for net/ that you already merged, but
> for drivers/net. The patches replaces the open coding to check for a Kconfig
> symbol being built-in or module, with IS_ENABLED() macro that does the same.

Series applied, thanks.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 00/15] drivers: net: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-09-12 16:10 +0200
  [PATCH 11/15] sfc: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-09-12 16:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 11/15] sfc: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Bert Kenward <bkenward@solarflare.com> - 2016-09-12 16:40 +0200
  [PATCH 12/15] sis900: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-09-12 16:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 12/15] sis900: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module Daniele Venzano <venza@brownhat.org> - 2016-09-12 19:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 00/15] drivers: net: use IS_ENABLED() instead of  checking for built-in or module David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-09-13 05:30 +0200

csiph-web