Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1471902
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 |
| Date | 2016-08-29 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sbwmd-rU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <s95zQ-3HK-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9fIS-1yv-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9XgS-6iK-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9XgS-6iK-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbwcy-9f-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon 29-08-16 16:52:03, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 25, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > Any luck with the testing of this patch? > > I ran rc3 for a few hours on Friday amd FireFox was not killed. > Now rc3 is running for a day with the usual workload and FireFox is > still running. Is the patch (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160823074339.GB23577@dhcp22.suse.cz) applied? > Today I noticed the nfsserver was disabled, probably since months already. > Starting it gives a OOM, not sure if this is new with 4.7+. > Full dmesg attached. > [93348.306369] modprobe: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x26040c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOTRACK) ok so order-4 (COSTLY allocation) has failed because [...] > [93348.313778] Node 0 DMA: 1*4kB (U) 0*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB (U) 2*64kB (U) 1*128kB (U) 1*256kB (U) 0*512kB 1*1024kB (U) 1*2048kB (M) 3*4096kB (M) = 15908kB > [93348.313803] Node 0 DMA32: 13633*4kB (UME) 8035*8kB (UME) 890*16kB (UME) 10*32kB (U) 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 133372kB > [93348.313822] Node 0 Normal: 14003*4kB (UME) 25*8kB (UME) 2*16kB (UM) 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 56244kB the memory is too fragmented for such a large allocation. Failing order-4 requests is not so severe because we do not invoke the oom killer if they fail. Especially without GFP_REPEAT we do not even try too hard. Recent oom detection changes shouldn't change this behavior. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> - 2016-08-29 17:00 +0200
Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> - 2016-08-29 17:00 +0200
Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-08-29 17:10 +0200
Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> - 2016-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-08-29 19:30 +0200
Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> - 2016-08-29 20:00 +0200
csiph-web