Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #171482
| From | Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? |
| Date | 2016-08-27 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <saO1P-6k5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <saqVz-ki-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sauFQ-2Ek-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <saCk2-7AH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <saCtH-7DW-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
"John T. Haggerty" <jpcookie@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:06:15 +0200 Frederic Marchal > <frederic.marchal@wowtechnology.com> wrote: > > > The download must be long > > enough (more than one minute) for the attacker to discover the > set > > of parameters that will make the attack successful. > > You've forgotten how the modern web works. People have http: > connections live for very long periods of time, with dynamic > content > flittering back and forth over the channel. It isn't like 1996 any > more where someone downloaded some static HTML and closed the TCP > connection until the next page was downloaded when they clicked > again. It hasn't been like that in a very long time. > > So you are referring to the "netstat" output from the system itself? > So physically redraw the page they are on even if they haven't > refreshed the page? I'm not sure how netstat is relevant here.... but think of protocols like AJAX where, indeed, content on a web page can be updated without any user activity. Do you have a facebook account? I frequently have a browser open to it for days at a time while it updates my feed (in fairness, that's https: not http:, but the point about long-lived connections remains valid).
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-26 17:10 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 17:20 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 18:40 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-26 19:50 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Frederic Marchal <frederic.marchal@wowtechnology.com> - 2016-08-26 21:10 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-27 05:20 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "John T. Haggerty" <jpcookie@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 05:30 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-08-27 17:50 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Frederic Marchal <frederic.marchal@wowtechnology.com> - 2016-08-28 14:40 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-28 21:40 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 23:30 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2016-08-29 13:00 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-29 18:20 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-29 18:40 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-08-29 19:40 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-29 20:30 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:50 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 00:40 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2016-08-30 06:50 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Neal P. Murphy" <neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu> - 2016-08-29 03:30 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 05:50 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Neal P. Murphy" <neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu> - 2016-08-29 07:10 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2016-08-29 07:30 +0200
Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-29 18:20 +0200
csiph-web