Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #171482

Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed?

From Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed?
Date 2016-08-27 17:50 +0200
Message-ID <saO1P-6k5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <saqVz-ki-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sauFQ-2Ek-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <saCk2-7AH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <saCtH-7DW-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization A noiseless patient Spider

Show all headers | View raw


"John T. Haggerty" <jpcookie@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
> wrote:
>
>    On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:06:15 +0200 Frederic Marchal
>    <frederic.marchal@wowtechnology.com> wrote:
>
>     > The download must be long
>     > enough (more than one minute) for the attacker to discover the
>     set
>     > of parameters that will make the attack successful.
>     
>     You've forgotten how the modern web works. People have http:
>     connections live for very long periods of time, with dynamic
>     content
>     flittering back and forth over the channel. It isn't like 1996 any
>     more where someone downloaded some static HTML and closed the TCP
>     connection until the next page was downloaded when they clicked
>     again. It hasn't been like that in a very long time.
>
> So you are referring to the "netstat" output from the system itself?
> So physically redraw the page they are on even if they haven't
> refreshed the page?

I'm not sure how netstat is relevant here....  but think of protocols
like AJAX where, indeed, content on a web page can be updated without
any user activity.  Do you have a facebook account?  I frequently have a
browser open to it for days at a time while it updates my feed (in
fairness, that's https: not http:, but the point about long-lived
connections remains valid).

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-26 17:10 +0200
  Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 17:20 +0200
    Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 18:40 +0200
      Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-26 19:50 +0200
  Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Frederic Marchal <frederic.marchal@wowtechnology.com> - 2016-08-26 21:10 +0200
    Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-27 05:20 +0200
      Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "John T. Haggerty" <jpcookie@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 05:30 +0200
        Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-08-27 17:50 +0200
      Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Frederic Marchal <frederic.marchal@wowtechnology.com> - 2016-08-28 14:40 +0200
        Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-28 21:40 +0200
          Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 23:30 +0200
          Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2016-08-29 13:00 +0200
            Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-29 18:20 +0200
              Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-29 18:40 +0200
                Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-08-29 19:40 +0200
                Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-29 20:30 +0200
              Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:50 +0200
                Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 00:40 +0200
                Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2016-08-30 06:50 +0200
        Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Neal P. Murphy" <neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu> - 2016-08-29 03:30 +0200
          Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 05:50 +0200
            Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Neal P. Murphy" <neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu> - 2016-08-29 07:10 +0200
              Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2016-08-29 07:30 +0200
                Re: Any idea when CVE-2016-5696 is going to get fixed? "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> - 2016-08-29 18:20 +0200

csiph-web