Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1558045

Re: blk_queue_bounce_limit() broken for mask=0xffffffff on 64bit archs

From Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: blk_queue_bounce_limit() broken for mask=0xffffffff on 64bit archs
Date 2017-01-13 07:20 +0100
Message-ID <sZ3nr-5Pk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sXP3b-qJ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ3dM-5M4-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


>> There is a use cases when architecture is 64-bit but hardware supports
>> only DMA to lower 4G of address space. E.g. NVMe device on RCar PCIe host.
>>
>> For such cases, it looks proper to call blk_queue_bounce_limit() with
>> mask set to 0xffffffff - thus making block layer to use bounce buffers
>> for any addresses beyond 4G.  To support that, architecture provides
>> GFP_DMA zone that covers exactly low 4G on arm64.
>>
>> However setting this limit does not work:
>>
>>   if (b_pfn < (min_t(u64, 0xffffffffUL, BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
>>       dma = 1;
>>
>> When mask is 0xffffffff that condition is false
> 
> That should have been true in your case, since the b_pfn is smaller than
> 0xffffffff.

b_pfn is exactly 0xffffffffUL >> SHIFT, thus contition is false

>>   q->limits.bounce_pfn = max(max_low_pfn, b_pfn);
>>
>> this line is executed and replaces any limit with end of memory (on
>> 64bit arch all memory is low).
> 
> I don't understand why max() is used? And why not min()?
> 
> Looks the above line just disables bounce for 64bit arch, doesn't it?

Effectively yes. And I don't understand logic behind this code.

Nikita

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

blk_queue_bounce_limit() broken for mask=0xffffffff on 64bit archs Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> - 2017-01-09 21:50 +0100
  Re: blk_queue_bounce_limit() broken for mask=0xffffffff on 64bit  archs Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-01-09 22:10 +0100
  Re: blk_queue_bounce_limit() broken for mask=0xffffffff on 64bit archs Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 07:10 +0100
    Re: blk_queue_bounce_limit() broken for mask=0xffffffff on 64bit  archs Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> - 2017-01-13 07:20 +0100

csiph-web