Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1558004
| From | Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion |
| Date | 2017-01-13 05:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZ1lE-4Bb-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sXLiW-6zl-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sYPkt-5y0-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2017/1/12 下午11:09, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > Hey Coly, > >> Also I receive reports from users that raid1 performance is desired when >> it is built on NVMe SSDs as a cache (maybe bcache or dm-cache). I am >> working on some raid1 performance improvement (e.g. new raid1 I/O >> barrier and lockless raid1 I/O submit), and have some more ideas to >> discuss. > > Do you have some performance measurements to share? > > Mike used null devices to simulate very fast devices which > led to nice performance enhancements in dm-multipath code. I have several performance data of raid1 and raid0, which is still work in progress. - md raid1 Current md raid1 read performance is not ideal. A raid1 with 2 NVMe SSD, only observe 2.6GB/s throughput for multi I/O and depth reading. Most of the time spending on I/O barrier locking. Now I am working on a lockless I/O submit patch (the original idea is from Hannes Reinecke), which improves reading throughput to 4.7~5GB/s. When using md raid1 as a cache device, reading performance improvement is critical. On my hardware, the ideal reading throughput of 2 NVMe is 6GB/s, currently the reading performance number is 4.7~5GB/s, still have a little some space to improve. - md raid0 People reports on linux-raid mailing list that DISCARD/TRIM performance on raid0 is slow. In my reproducing, a raid0 built by 4x3TB NVMe SSD, formatting a XFS volume on top of it takes 306 seconds. Most of the time is inside md raid0 code to issue DISCARD/TRIM request in chunk size range. I compose a POC patch to re-combine a large DISCARD/TRIM command into per-device request, which reduces the formatting time to 15 seconds. Now I work on patch simplifying by the suggestions from upstream maintainers. For raid1, currently most of feed backs are from read performance. Coly
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> - 2017-01-09 17:50 +0100
Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> - 2017-01-12 16:20 +0100
Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> - 2017-01-13 05:10 +0100
Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> - 2017-01-16 04:40 +0100
Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2017-01-16 06:50 +0100
csiph-web