Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #176567

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

From Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")
Date 2017-01-10 21:20 +0100
Message-ID <sYb3I-5OA-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <sXnqh-857-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXwDf-5IQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXQiC-1l8-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXSaK-2sc-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXSkp-2vm-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote:
>>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
>>
>> you can still use sysvinit as init

I read that trying to use sysvinit causes trouble and several things
depend on systemd at the moment.

> The shell scripts used by sysvinit are not simpler. More familiar maybe,
> but not simpler.

Simplicity can very roughly approximated by source code size.
Do you think the systemd implementation of the fsck wrapper
is simpler that "fsck -A"?

I hope GNU/Linux forks off as soon as systemd integrates an own
kernel (systemk) and its reimplementation of Wayland (systemx)
in one binary image blob, which for technical reasons will
temporarily be called \EFI\BOOT\BOOTx64.EFI, but only until
UEFI BIOS functionalities are fully integrated. Then you can POST
and fsck in parallel, write units that depend on POST (so X won't
start before POST passed! Imagine that!!) to form a clean, simple
and modern-to-the-max system.

SCNR :-)

Steffen

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but  "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 15:20 +0100
  Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 16:20 +0100
    Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-09 02:10 +0100
      Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 23:10 +0100
        Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 01:10 +0100
          Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 01:20 +0100
            Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 09:40 +0100
              Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-10 10:00 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 15:20 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 18:50 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2017-01-10 22:20 +0100
            Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 21:20 +0100
              Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-01-10 21:50 +0100
              Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-10 21:50 +0100
              Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-10 22:10 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2017-01-10 22:50 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 01:40 +0100
        Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 11:50 +0100
        Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Dominique Dumont <dod@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 13:10 +0100
          Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-10 18:00 +0100
          Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 21:20 +0100
  Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 09:20 +0100

csiph-web