Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #176559
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") |
| Date | 2017-01-10 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sY7W9-3M3-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sXmud-7tQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXwDf-5IQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXQiC-1l8-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sY3pw-1at-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 12:51:09 (+0100), Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday, 9 January 2017 22:49:02 CET Steffen Dettmer wrote: > > I'm looking at Jessie (Debian 8) man fsck. I found no refernce > > to systemd. I think this is some compatiblity feature of systemd. > > See systemd.mount(5) and systemd.swap(5) > > Compatiblity is done by systemd-fstab-generator So it would appear that what's needed is a reference from man fstab to a man systemd.fstab (newly written), particularly in view of statements like "If a swap device or file is configured in both /etc/fstab and a unit file, the configuration in the latter takes precedence"¹. But, in the absence of that, careful perusal of all of man systemd-fstab-generator man systemd-fsck man systemd-remount-fs man systemd.mount man systemd.swap (source of ¹) is advisable. It doesn't really make sense to read man.fsck without systemd-fstab-generator and systemd-fsck open at the same time because the latter two directly contradict what's written in the first. Perhaps man fsck etc should really be invoked as man sysv-fsck etc. Cheers, David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 15:20 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 16:20 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-09 02:10 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 23:10 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 01:10 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 01:20 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 09:40 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-10 10:00 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 15:20 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 18:50 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2017-01-10 22:20 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 21:20 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-01-10 21:50 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-10 21:50 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-10 22:10 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2017-01-10 22:50 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 01:40 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 11:50 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Dominique Dumont <dod@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 13:10 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-10 18:00 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 21:20 +0100
Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 09:20 +0100
csiph-web