Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #176559

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

From David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")
Date 2017-01-10 18:00 +0100
Message-ID <sY7W9-3M3-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sXmud-7tQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXwDf-5IQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXQiC-1l8-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sY3pw-1at-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 12:51:09 (+0100), Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Monday, 9 January 2017 22:49:02 CET Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> > I'm looking at Jessie (Debian 8) man fsck. I found no refernce
> > to systemd. I think this is some compatiblity feature of systemd.
> 
> See  systemd.mount(5) and systemd.swap(5) 
> 
> Compatiblity is done by systemd-fstab-generator

So it would appear that what's needed is a reference
from   man fstab   to a   man systemd.fstab (newly written),
particularly in view of statements like "If a swap device or
file is configured in both /etc/fstab and a unit file, the
configuration in the latter takes precedence"¹.

But, in the absence of that, careful perusal of all of

man systemd-fstab-generator
man systemd-fsck
man systemd-remount-fs
man systemd.mount
man systemd.swap (source of ¹)

is advisable. It doesn't really make sense to read   man.fsck
without systemd-fstab-generator and systemd-fsck open at the
same time because the latter two directly contradict what's
written in the first. Perhaps   man fsck   etc should really
be invoked as   man sysv-fsck   etc.

Cheers,
David.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but  "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 15:20 +0100
  Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 16:20 +0100
    Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-09 02:10 +0100
      Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 23:10 +0100
        Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 01:10 +0100
          Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 01:20 +0100
            Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 09:40 +0100
              Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-10 10:00 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 15:20 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 18:50 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Charlie <ariestao1@ipstarmail.com.au> - 2017-01-10 22:20 +0100
            Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 21:20 +0100
              Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-01-10 21:50 +0100
              Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-10 21:50 +0100
              Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-10 22:10 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2017-01-10 22:50 +0100
                Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 01:40 +0100
        Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 11:50 +0100
        Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode") Dominique Dumont <dod@debian.org> - 2017-01-10 13:10 +0100
          Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-10 18:00 +0100
          Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error  but "maintenance mode") Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dettmer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 21:20 +0100
  Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 09:20 +0100

csiph-web