Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1550053

[PATCH 0/6] ata: Missing HAS_DMA dependencies

Show all headers | View raw

	Hi all,

Bartlomiej's "[PATCH 1/3] ata: allow subsystem to be used on m68k arch"
exposed a few missing dependencies on HAS_DMA. This series allows to
build again "allmodconfig" and "allyesconfig" kernels tailored for
Sun-3, which sets NO_DMA=y.

Geert Uytterhoeven (6):
  ata: SATA_MV should depend on HAS_DMA
  ata: SATA_HIGHBANK should depend on HAS_DMA
  ata: ATA_BMDMA should depend on HAS_DMA
  ata: AHCI and other non-SFF native drivers should depend on HAS_DMA
  libata: Make ata_sg_clean() static again
  libata: Protect DMA core code by #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DMA

 drivers/ata/Kconfig       |  7 ++++++
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 drivers/ata/libata.h      |  1 -
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0/6] ata: Missing HAS_DMA dependencies Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-03 19:20 +0100
  [PATCH 1/6] ata: SATA_MV should depend on HAS_DMA Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-03 19:20 +0100
  [PATCH 3/6] ata: ATA_BMDMA should depend on HAS_DMA Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-03 19:20 +0100
  [PATCH 2/6] ata: SATA_HIGHBANK should depend on HAS_DMA Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-03 19:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/6] ata: Missing HAS_DMA dependencies Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-06 17:40 +0100

csiph-web