Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

From	Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level
Date	2016-12-31 15:20 +0100
Message-ID	<sUsFP-42C-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sTt1g-4Xg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sUrqp-32Y-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sUrA5-3lu-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sUsmt-3Dj-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/31/2016 7:49 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 31 December 2016 08:01:15 Nicolas George wrote:
>
>> Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXV, Gene Heskett a écrit :
>>>  From personal experience decades ago, on a dos3.2 system, this is
>>> correct. But I can't testify about the newer, or the now several
>>> non-M$ versions of dos. I saw an announcement of yet another dos
>>> release just a couple weeks back. I assume its getting better
>>
>> Think a little more about it: it is a limitation of the format, not
>> the operating system. If an operating system extends the format, it is
>> no longer compatible with the rest of the world, and then there is no
>> reason to use FAT at all.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Perhaps Nicolas, but ATM I am having it shoved down my throat because I
> am playing with using a raspberrypi 3b to run a 1500 lb metal lathe, and
> for some reason the boot partition is dos, but mounted as /boot to armhf
> version of the debian jessie currently installed. Seems to me the r-pi
> bios needs fixed to boot from an ext4 file system.  But I'm not in
> charge of such, can't even blow the whistle. I'm still kicking the tires
> on the whole idea. Using the SPI bus at 32 megabaud to talk to the
> peripheral driver that runs the machine, I am finding that the noise
> radiated by the motor supplies, which are switchmode, running at 17-19
> kilohertz, have enough radiated noise to wreck a 32 megabuad
> communications bus 7 inches long.

Are you sure the problem is radiated noise.
Could it be a ground loop?
Prompted by vague recollections from decades past student days. YMMV


> So I am cabbaging filter parts from
> old computer psu's to see if I can quiet these power supplies down to a
> dull roar.  A film at 11 situation I fear.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
>

Thread

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Xen <list@xenhideout.nl> - 2016-12-29 07:40 +0100
  Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-31 10:40 +0100
    Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-12-31 14:00 +0100
      Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-12-31 14:10 +0100
        Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-12-31 15:00 +0100
          Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-12-31 15:20 +0100
            Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-12-31 16:40 +0100
          Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-12-31 16:40 +0100
        Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-31 16:30 +0100
    Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-01 00:30 +0100
      Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-01 13:20 +0100
        Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-02 15:40 +0100
          Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-01-02 16:30 +0100
            Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-01-02 16:30 +0100
              Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-01-02 17:40 +0100
          Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-02 20:50 +0100
    Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Xen <list@xenhideout.nl> - 2017-01-01 12:50 +0100

csiph-web