Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

From	Xen <list@xenhideout.nl>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level
Date	2017-01-01 12:50 +0100
Message-ID	<sUMOd-8fT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sTt1g-4Xg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sTt1f-4Xg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sTCxz-32V-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sUoiS-18f-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

tomas@tuxteam.de schreef op 31-12-2016 10:35:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 07:38:18AM +0100, Xen wrote:
>> doark@mail.com schreef op 26-12-2016 3:41:
>> 
>> >I encountered this many times on windowz FAT32 in a non-root dir, but
>> >never on Linux. I suspect that it was/is one of their "Features". The
>> >said "Feature" still was there when using ntfs in XP if I remember
>> >correctly.
>> 
>> Perhaps it's just because Windows Explorer doesn't deal well with
>> many files. Try to unpack some open source archive of some
>> distributor that had to make their sources open, some 1G archive,
>> and see how it goes. Not recommended :p.
>> 
>> Then when you've unpacked it, deleting it takes a few years as well.
>> So imposing a filesystem limit may just have been a way to ensure
>> that their user interface limit is not quickly reached, I don't
>> know.
> 
> Calculemus, as Leibnitz said. A bit of experimental informatics:
> 
>   dd if=/dev/zero of=dose bs=4096 count=64
>   mkfs.vfat dose
>   sudo mkfs.vfat dose
>   sudo mount dose /mnt
>   for i in $(seq 1 10000) ; do sudo touch /mnt/f.$(printf "%05d" $i)
> || echo "fail $i" ; done
> 
> The loop starts failing at i == 257 with "no space left on device"
> (that's ENOSPC if I remember correctly). The "device" has still
> reams of space left:
> 
>   tomas@rasputin:~$ df -h
>   Filesystem                 Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>   [...]
>   /dev/loop0                 238K     0  238K   0% /mnt
> 
> So 256 must be a limit on number of entries on the top level dir of
> FATty file systems (or an implementation limit of Linux's version
> of that, but guess whom I trust more to bust that badly).
> 
> Try this at home. Enjoy.

That person spoke about a non-root dir which is what I responded to.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Xen <list@xenhideout.nl> - 2016-12-29 07:40 +0100
  Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-31 10:40 +0100
    Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-12-31 14:00 +0100
      Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-12-31 14:10 +0100
        Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-12-31 15:00 +0100
          Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-12-31 15:20 +0100
            Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-12-31 16:40 +0100
          Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-12-31 16:40 +0100
        Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-31 16:30 +0100
    Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-01 00:30 +0100
      Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-01 13:20 +0100
        Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-01-02 15:40 +0100
          Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-01-02 16:30 +0100
            Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-01-02 16:30 +0100
              Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-01-02 17:40 +0100
          Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-01-02 20:50 +0100
    Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level Xen <list@xenhideout.nl> - 2017-01-01 12:50 +0100

csiph-web