Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5160
| From | Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: embedding openssl source in sslcan |
| Date | 2016-12-26 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sSB0S-3Fv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sRaP8-140-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sRYVz-1Rj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sS1Tr-3L2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | @||@ |
Seems like a decent idea for this, if other packages need an insecure openssl. As for making it hard to link to, the .so can be put into a non-standard dir so it has to be explicitly enabled both with a -lcrypto-insecure and -L/usr/lib/openssl-insecure. .hc Jonathan Yu: > Given that this would be useful for other tools, perhaps it's best to > create an "openssl-insecure" package which would ship a version of openssl > that has all the bells-and-whistles enabled (including the insecure ones). > We would have to take care that nothing is unintentionally linked to the > library. It would be a useful companion to software like testssl.sh (which > has similar requirements to sslscan) > > I certainly don't have strong feelings about this, especially given that I > haven't done any of the work... Just a thought :) > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote: > >> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> schrieb: >> >> Please use team@security.debian.org if you want to reach the security >> team, not debian-security@ldo. >> >>> tl;dr: Has anyone a problem if sslscan embeds openssl 1.0.2 in its >>> source? >> >> That's for post-stretch, right? Right now it can simply link against >> the 1.0.2 copy, >> >> Seems fine to me for that use case, and it won't need any security >> updates to the embedded openssl copy for all practical purposes anyway. >> >> Cheers, >> Moritz >> >> > >
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
embedding openssl source in sslcan Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2016-12-22 13:40 +0100
Re: embedding openssl source in sslcan Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-12-24 19:10 +0100
Re: embedding openssl source in sslcan Jonathan Yu <jawnsy@cpan.org> - 2016-12-24 22:20 +0100
Re: embedding openssl source in sslcan Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2016-12-26 11:50 +0100
Re: embedding openssl source in sslcan "Thijs Kinkhorst" <thijs@debian.org> - 2017-01-02 11:40 +0100
Re: embedding openssl source in sslcan Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-01-02 17:20 +0100
csiph-web