Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #175755

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

From Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?
Date 2016-12-16 22:30 +0100
Message-ID <sP8eJ-w9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sOzqF-3rd-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sP7LH-5f-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sP8eJ-w9-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Friday 16 December 2016 21:19:45 Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:55:32 +0000
>
> Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The fact that some people do not know
> > enough to use Spam folders differently from deleted mail is not a
> > reason why the rest of us should have our email dropped.
>
> The reason why your mail gets dropped is that it cannot accurately be
> identified as not-spam, as I'm sure you know.

You have over-cut.  Here is what you cut, which is highly relevant:

"On Friday 16 December 2016 09:58:36 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > At least in the case of delivery to the SPAM box the mail has been
> > actually delivered to the user.
>
> "Technically", yes.

No, not just technically.  Actually.  The recipient then has the choice 
whether to ignore it or not."

Delivering to a Spam folder, and dropping mail, are simply not the same thing, 
however hard it may be to distinguish the correct route for any one piece of 
mail.

Lisi.
>
> If it really is spam, then the Reply-To header is forged, and the last
> thing that should be done is to send the message 'back', *quoting* *it*
> *in* *full*, to a third party who had nothing to do with it, and who has
> now been sent spam from a presumably legitimate mail server.
>
> The problem is not to do with the silent dropping of spam, which is the
> correct behaviour for a mail server which has been foolish enough to
> accept it in the first place, but to identify it with 100% accuracy and
> thereby to prevent the dropping of genuine email. Solve that and you
> can name your price...
>
> The next best thing is to identify spam at the SMTP transmission stage
> and to refuse it, which *does* tell the sender of mis-identified
> legitimate email that it has not been delivered.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> - 2016-12-15 09:20 +0100
  Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-12-15 10:50 +0100
    Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-12-15 21:40 +0100
      Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-12-15 21:50 +0100
        Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> - 2016-12-16 08:00 +0100
          Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-16 10:00 +0100
            Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-12-16 10:20 +0100
              Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-16 11:00 +0100
                Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 22:00 +0100
                Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 22:30 +0100
                Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-16 22:50 +0100
                Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-12-16 23:50 +0100
                Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 00:50 +0100
                Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-12-16 22:30 +0100
                Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-12-17 13:10 +0100
          Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-12-16 10:10 +0100
    Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-12-16 13:10 +0100
      Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-12-16 13:20 +0100
      Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-12-16 19:00 +0100
        Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-12-19 13:10 +0100
          Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-12-19 18:40 +0100
            Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-12-20 01:30 +0100
  Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 20:30 +0100
    Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-12-15 22:00 +0100
  Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian? terryc <terryc@woa.com.au> - 2016-12-16 03:40 +0100

csiph-web