Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 15 (fs/ubifs/ causes problems in fs/crypto/)

From	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 15 (fs/ubifs/ causes problems in fs/crypto/)
Date	2016-12-15 23:50 +0100
Message-ID	<sON0B-3bS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sOuU2-zU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sOINk-G7-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Randy,

On 15.12.2016 19:13, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/14/16 19:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please do not add any material for v4.11 to your linux-next included
>> branches until after v4.10-rc1 has been released.
>>
>> Changes since 20161214:
>>
> 
> on x86_64:
> 
> when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled:
> 
> warning: (UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION) selects FS_ENCRYPTION which has unmet direct dependencies (BLOCK)

UBIFS does not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK but fs/crypto/ does.
As short-term solution we can make UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION depend on CONFIG_BLOCK,
a better solution would be extracting all block specific stuff from fs/crypto/crypto.c
to another file.

Thanks,
//richard

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: Tree for Dec 15 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-12-15 04:30 +0100
  Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 15 (fs/ubifs/ causes problems in  fs/crypto/) Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> - 2016-12-15 19:20 +0100
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 15 (fs/ubifs/ causes problems in  fs/crypto/) Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-12-15 23:50 +0100

csiph-web