Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1537921
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 16/18] arm64: ptrace: handle ptrace_request differently for aarch32 and ilp32 |
| Date | 2016-12-07 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sLNJx-2Ce-77@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <svVUK-5lu-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sL4t4-6UN-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <sL4t4-6UN-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <sLNJx-2Ce-79@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:55:08AM +0530, Yury Norov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:34:23PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:33:15PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > > > New aarch32 ptrace syscall handler is introduced to avoid run-time > > > detection of the task type. > > > > What's wrong with the run-time detection? If it's just to avoid a > > negligible overhead, I would rather keep the code simpler by avoiding > > duplicating the generic compat_sys_ptrace(). > > Nothing wrong. This is how Arnd asked me to do. You already asked this > question: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1604.3/00930.html Hmm, I completely forgot about this ;). There is still an advantage to doing run-time checking if we avoid touching core code (less acks to gather and less code duplication). Let's see what Arnd says but the initial patch looked simpler. -- Catalin
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 16/18] arm64: ptrace: handle ptrace_request differently for aarch32 and ilp32 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-12-05 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 16/18] arm64: ptrace: handle ptrace_request differently for aarch32 and ilp32 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-12-07 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 16/18] arm64: ptrace: handle ptrace_request differently for aarch32 and ilp32 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-07 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 16/18] arm64: ptrace: handle ptrace_request differently for aarch32 and ilp32 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-12-08 14:20 +0100
csiph-web