Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1533199
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions |
| Date | 2016-11-30 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJasW-4VL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sDLER-5lG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ9Qe-4q9-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote: > On 15/11/2016 14:09, Eric Auger wrote: > > Following LPC discussions, we now report reserved regions through > > iommu-group sysfs reserved_regions attribute file. > > > > Reserved regions are populated through the IOMMU get_resv_region callback > > (former get_dm_regions), now implemented by amd-iommu, intel-iommu and > > arm-smmu. > > > > The intel-iommu reports the [FEE0_0000h - FEF0_000h] MSI window as an > > IOMMU_RESV_NOMAP reserved region. > > > > arm-smmu reports the MSI window (arbitrarily located at 0x8000000 and > > 1MB large) and the PCI host bridge windows. > > > > The series integrates a not officially posted patch from Robin: > > "iommu/dma: Allow MSI-only cookies". > > > > This series currently does not address IRQ safety assessment. > > I will respin this series taking into account Joerg's comment. Does > anyone have additional comments or want to put forward some conceptual > issues with the current direction and with this implementation? > > As for the IRQ safety assessment, in a first step I would propose to > remove the IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP from arm-smmus and consider the > assignment as unsafe. Any objection? Well, yeah, because it's perfectly safe with GICv3. Will
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 11:00 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 11:10 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 11:20 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:00 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-11-30 15:00 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-11-30 11:40 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 15:10 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-11-30 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-12-07 20:00 +0100
Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> - 2016-12-08 08:40 +0100
csiph-web