Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1532453

Re: [PATCH v7 04/16] drivers: iommu: make of_iommu_set/get_ops() DT agnostic

From Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v7 04/16] drivers: iommu: make of_iommu_set/get_ops() DT agnostic
Date 2016-11-29 17:10 +0100
Message-ID <sIT8J-2eS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <sDmGu-5IO-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDofg-6Oy-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDrPQ-sM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDub0-28T-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sE5ay-198-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:56:15AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> I can easily make the changes Robin suggests above, I need to know
> what to do with this patch it is the last blocking point for this
> series and time is running out I can revert to using dev->bus to
> retrieve iommu_ops (even though I do not think it makes sense given
> what Robin outlines below) but I need to know please, we can't gate
> an entire series for this patch that is just syntactic sugar.

Well, I didn't really object to the approach per-se, I just wanted to
know the rationale behind the need for the iommu-ops pointer. So through
which tree should this series be merged?
I think I can live with the pointer for now, we can later convert it to
an iommu-instance pointer.


	Joerg

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v7 04/16] drivers: iommu: make of_iommu_set/get_ops() DT  agnostic Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> - 2016-11-29 17:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v7 04/16] drivers: iommu: make of_iommu_set/get_ops() DT  agnostic Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-11-29 18:10 +0100

csiph-web