Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1528007

Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros_ec: Use proper protocol transfer function

From Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros_ec: Use proper protocol transfer function
Date 2016-11-22 23:50 +0100
Message-ID <sGs2Z-4VW-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s4IBP-1DK-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


+ Benson

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:45:12PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
> 
> pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had
> one instance of these functions correct, but not the second, fall-back
> case. We use the fall-back only when the first command returns an
> IN_PROGRESS status, which is only used on some EC firmwares where we
> don't want to constantly poll the bus, but instead back off and
> sleep/retry for a little while.
> 
> Fixes: 2c7589af3c4d ("mfd: cros_ec: add proto v3 skeleton")
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS tells me this goes through Olof, but many things have gone through
> Lee.

I believe this was supposed to go through Olof. Olof, are you out there?

Or Benson? I see this:

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1273587.html
[PATCH] platform/chrome : Add myself as Maintainer

but it's not merged anywhere AFAICT.

I can resend if that helps.

Brian

>  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> index 6c084b266651..591f0b0becbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> @@ -59,12 +59,14 @@ static int send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>  			struct cros_ec_command *msg)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> +	int (*xfer_fxn)(struct cros_ec_device *ec, struct cros_ec_command *msg);
>  
>  	if (ec_dev->proto_version > 2)
> -		ret = ec_dev->pkt_xfer(ec_dev, msg);
> +		xfer_fxn = ec_dev->pkt_xfer;
>  	else
> -		ret = ec_dev->cmd_xfer(ec_dev, msg);
> +		xfer_fxn = ec_dev->cmd_xfer;
>  
> +	ret = (*xfer_fxn)(ec_dev, msg);
>  	if (msg->result == EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS) {
>  		int i;
>  		struct cros_ec_command *status_msg;
> @@ -87,7 +89,7 @@ static int send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>  		for (i = 0; i < EC_COMMAND_RETRIES; i++) {
>  			usleep_range(10000, 11000);
>  
> -			ret = ec_dev->cmd_xfer(ec_dev, status_msg);
> +			ret = (*xfer_fxn)(ec_dev, status_msg);
>  			if (ret < 0)
>  				break;
>  
> -- 
> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros_ec: Use proper protocol transfer function Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-11-22 23:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros_ec: Use proper protocol transfer function Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> - 2016-11-23 00:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros_ec: Use proper protocol transfer function Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-11-23 09:40 +0100

csiph-web