Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1519583
| From | Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [patch] mm, slab: faster active and free stats |
| Date | 2016-11-11 07:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCd2x-c0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sBnGG-7AF-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBnQm-7DS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBLzj-6wR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:38:08PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > Reading /proc/slabinfo or monitoring slabtop(1) can become very expensive
> > > if there are many slab caches and if there are very lengthy per-node
> > > partial and/or free lists.
> > >
> > > Commit 07a63c41fa1f ("mm/slab: improve performance of gathering slabinfo
> > > stats") addressed the per-node full lists which showed a significant
> > > improvement when no objects were freed. This patch has the same
> > > motivation and optimizes the remainder of the usecases where there are
> > > very lengthy partial and free lists.
> > >
> > > This patch maintains per-node active_slabs (full and partial) and
> > > free_slabs rather than iterating the lists at runtime when reading
> > > /proc/slabinfo.
> >
> > Are there any nice numbers you can share?
> >
>
> Yes, please add this to the description:
>
>
> When allocating 100GB of slab from a test cache where every slab page is
> on the partial list, reading /proc/slabinfo (includes all other slab
> caches on the system) takes ~247ms on average with 48 samples.
>
> As a result of this patch, the same read takes ~0.856ms on average.
Hello, David.
Maintaining acitve/free_slab counters looks so complex. And, I think
that we don't need to maintain these counters for faster slabinfo.
Key point is to remove iterating n->slabs_partial list.
We can calculate active slab/object by following equation as you did in
this patch.
active_slab(n) = n->num_slab - the number of free_slab
active_object(n) = n->num_slab * cachep->num - n->free_objects
To get the number of free_slab, we need to iterate n->slabs_free list
but I guess it would be small enough.
If you don't like to iterate n->slabs_free list in slabinfo, just
maintaining the number of slabs_free would be enough.
Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[patch] mm, slab: faster active and free stats David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-11-09 00:10 +0100
Re: [patch] mm, slab: faster active and free stats Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-09 00:20 +0100
Re: [patch] mm, slab: faster active and free stats David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-11-10 01:40 +0100
Re: [patch] mm, slab: faster active and free stats Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-11-11 07:00 +0100
Re: [patch] mm, slab: faster active and free stats David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-11-11 11:40 +0100
csiph-web