Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program

From	Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program
Date	2016-11-12 08:40 +0100
Message-ID	<sCB4S-7qv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sCnlf-6OQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCnlf-6OQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCohj-7nJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCrIe-1lU-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/11/2016 10:38 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I was wondering about that. 
> https://www.gnu.org/software/ddrescue/manual/ddrescue_manual.html is
> not first time user friendly. Will re-read after a good night's
> sleep. Will also look for appropriate tutorials. Suggestions?

Well, I would suggest not dumping the result on another partition
but rather into an image file. In that case you'd have the old
drive (not mounted), let's call it /dev/sda, and the new drive
with a partition on it and mounted on /mnt with sufficient free
disk space there.

In the simplest case you'd do:

ddrescue /dev/sda /mnt/defective_drive.img /mnt/defective_drive.log

If the drive is farther gone and has quite a few defective
sectors you may get better results if you use direct disk access
for the phase where you try to read defective sectors. In that case
you'd copy the bulk of the data while disabling the scraping phase
manually,

ddrescue -n /dev/sda /mnt/defective_drive.img /mnt/defective_drive.log

And then use direct access to scrape the rest:

ddrescue -d /dev/sda /mnt/defective_drive.img /mnt/defective_drive.log

Note that ddrescue assumes a default sector size of 512 bytes,
which is likely to be correct for older hard drives smaller than
2 TiB. If you have a newer hard drive, especially if it's rather
large, the physical sector size could be 4096 bytes instead.
(You can check the physical sector size of your disk by running
hdparm -I /dev/sda - that will tell you a lot of things about
your drive, among them the physical sector size in bytes. Note
that the physical sector size is relevant here, not the logical
one.)

In addition, you may also want to specify a number of retries
when trying to read defective sectors. (Default is 0.) You can
do that with the -r flag, e.g. -r3 for three retries per sector.

To recap:

 - Simplest way of calling the program is

   ddrescue /dev/sda output_image_file log_file

 - If the condition of your hard drive is a bit worse, you might
   achieve better results with:

   ddrescue -n /dev/sda output_image_file log_file
   ddrescue -d -r2 /dev/sda output_image_file log_file

   (-r2 is for 2 retries per defective sector, you can change
   that number; you can also call the second ddrescue command
   again in case you want to do more retries.)

 - If you have a new disk with 4096 bytes / sector (not likely)
   please also add a -b4096 to the command line.

 - If your target is not an image file, but a disk drive itself,
   also specify the -f option. (I would really recommend using
   image files though, gives you more flexibility.)

 - I wouldn't really bother with the other options, the default
   behavior is very sensible.

 - Finally, get some coffee or similar, this may take a while.

Regards,
Christian

Thread

Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-11-11 18:00 +0100
  Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2016-11-11 18:40 +0100
    Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-11-11 19:20 +0100
      Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-11 22:40 +0100
        Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-11-12 05:50 +0100
          Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-12 09:20 +0100
  Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-11-11 19:00 +0100
    Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-11 22:40 +0100
      Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2016-11-12 08:40 +0100
        Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-12 09:30 +0100
          Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-12 18:30 +0100
            Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-12 19:30 +0100
              Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-12 20:30 +0100
                Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2016-11-12 21:00 +0100
                Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-12 21:10 +0100
                Re: dd - proper use or more suitable program <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-12 22:00 +0100
                Invoking ddrescue Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-13 04:10 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-13 13:00 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-13 13:10 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-13 13:00 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-13 13:40 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 13:50 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-11-13 14:00 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-13 14:40 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 15:10 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-13 16:10 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-13 17:30 +0100
                Re: Invoking ddrescue Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-13 15:20 +0100
                Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-14 20:20 +0100
                Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2016-11-14 21:20 +0100
                Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-14 22:00 +0100
                Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-14 21:30 +0100
                Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-14 22:20 +0100
                Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-14 21:30 +0100
                Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-14 22:10 +0100
                Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-17 20:20 +0100
                SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-14 23:40 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-15 00:30 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-15 04:00 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-15 21:00 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-11-15 22:00 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-15 12:50 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-15 13:30 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-15 13:50 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-15 13:50 +0100
                Re: SUC[C]ESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-15 16:30 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-11-15 17:20 +0100
                Re: SUCESS!!! - was [Re: Progress report Re: Invoking ddrescue] Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-15 17:30 +0100

csiph-web