Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1519457

Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: hwpoison: soft offline supports thp migration

From Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: hwpoison: soft offline supports thp migration
Date 2016-11-11 01:00 +0100
Message-ID <sC7qa-4Sl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sB1Ga-1xZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sB1Ga-1xZ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBUVX-4sp-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:31:10PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/11/16 10:31, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > This patch enables thp migration for soft offline.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/memory-failure.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git v4.9-rc2-mmotm-2016-10-27-18-27/mm/memory-failure.c v4.9-rc2-mmotm-2016-10-27-18-27_patched/mm/memory-failure.c
> > index 19e796d..6cc8157 100644
> > --- v4.9-rc2-mmotm-2016-10-27-18-27/mm/memory-failure.c
> > +++ v4.9-rc2-mmotm-2016-10-27-18-27_patched/mm/memory-failure.c
> > @@ -1485,7 +1485,17 @@ static struct page *new_page(struct page *p, unsigned long private, int **x)
> >  	if (PageHuge(p))
> >  		return alloc_huge_page_node(page_hstate(compound_head(p)),
> >  						   nid);
> > -	else
> > +	else if (thp_migration_supported() && PageTransHuge(p)) {
> > +		struct page *thp;
> > +
> > +		thp = alloc_pages_node(nid,
> > +			(GFP_TRANSHUGE | __GFP_THISNODE) & ~__GFP_RECLAIM,
> > +			HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> > +		if (!thp)
> > +			return NULL;
> 
> Just wondering if new_page() fails, migration of that entry fails. Do we then
> split and migrate? I guess this applies to THP migration in general.

Yes, that's not implemented yet, but can be helpful.

I think that there are 2 types of callers of page migration,
one is a caller that specifies the target pages individually (like move_pages
and soft offline), and another is a caller that specifies the target pages
by (physical/virtual) address range basis.
Maybe the former ones want to fall back immediately to split and retry if
thp migration fails, and the latter ones want to retry thp migration more.
If this makes sense, we can make some more changes on retry logic to fit
the situation.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 09/12] mm: hwpoison: soft offline supports thp migration Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> - 2016-11-08 00:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: hwpoison: soft offline supports thp  migration Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 11:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: hwpoison: soft offline supports thp  migration Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> - 2016-11-11 01:00 +0100

csiph-web