Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1519059
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h |
| Date | 2016-11-10 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sBZCh-83k-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sBHcl-3eV-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBTGy-3Ex-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBZj1-7Uk-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:12:35AM -0600, Wei Huang wrote: > On 11/10/2016 03:10 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 09/11/16 19:57, Wei Huang wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h > >> +/* > >> + * ARMv8 PMUv3 Performance Events handling code. > >> + * Common event types. > >> + */ > >> + > >> +/* Required events. */ > >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR 0x00 > >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_L1D_CACHE_REFILL 0x03 > >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_L1D_CACHE 0x04 > >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_MIS_PRED 0x10 > >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES 0x11 > >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_PRED 0x12 > > > > In my initial review, I asked for the "required" events to be moved to a > > shared location. What's the rational for moving absolutely everything? > > I did notice the phrase "required" in the original email. However I > think it is weird to have two places for a same set of PMU definitions. > Other developers might think these two are missing if they don't search > kernel files carefully. > > If Will Deacon and you insist, I can move only two defs to perf_event.h, > consolidated with the 2nd patch into a single one. FWIW, my personal preference would be for all the definitions (or at least all of the ARMV8_PMUV3_* ones) to be in one place. That said, I don't feel particularly strongly either way, and I'll defer to Will. Thanks, Mark.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com> - 2016-11-09 21:00 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] KVM: ARM64: Fix the issues when guest PMCCFILTR is configured Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com> - 2016-11-09 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com> - 2016-11-10 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com> - 2016-11-10 19:20 +0100
csiph-web