Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5107

Re: vulnerability in 8.6

From advocatux <advocatux@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: vulnerability in 8.6
Date 2016-11-10 10:50 +0100
Message-ID <sBU9z-3Qs-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sAUuZ-52M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAUOl-5sm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBNrr-7MJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


El 10/11/16 a las 04:20, Richard Waterbeek escribió:
> [---snap---]
> But, I have looked for a update and I went to Debian package search and
> searched for; 'kernel image 686
> pae' [https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=stable&section=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=kernel+image+686+pae]
>
> This gave one result, which is; 'kernel-image-3.16.0-4-686-pae-di' and
> written with that, 'Linux kernel binary image for the Debian installer
> 3.16.36-1+deb8u1: i386'
>
> And I read that I need a '+deb8u2' kernel?
>
> Can someone explain to me what to do next? I have the assumption that a
> 'apt-get install "name-of-required-kerne-package"' would be sufficient?
>
> If not, can someone point me in the right direction on what to do,
> because the link Salvatore posted, it says on that page;
>
> 'For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
> version 3.16.36-1+deb8u2.
>
> We recommend that you upgrade your linux packages.'
>

Hi Richard, on the one hand if your package manager is configured 
properly, it should handle this situation without trouble.

Remember to run "update" to refresh the list of packages available 
before "upgrade".

On the other hand, if you're going to do a manual search you've to look 
for "linux image" not "kernel image" because the latter is for use in 
building debian-installer images only.

Regards.

--
advocatux

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

vulnerability in 8.6 Ozgur <okaratas@member.fsf.org> - 2016-11-07 17:00 +0100
  Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Richard van den Berg <richard@vdberg.org> - 2016-11-07 17:20 +0100
  Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2016-11-07 17:20 +0100
    Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Ozgur <okaratas@member.fsf.org> - 2016-11-07 17:50 +0100
      Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Nicholas Luedtke <nicholas.luedtke@hpe.com> - 2016-11-07 18:00 +0100
        Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Ozgur <okaratas@member.fsf.org> - 2016-11-07 18:10 +0100
          Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Matias Mucciolo <mmucciolo@suteba.org.ar> - 2016-11-07 18:10 +0100
          Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Andrew Deck <andrew.hastings.deck@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 18:20 +0100
      Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Matias Mucciolo <mmucciolo@suteba.org.ar> - 2016-11-07 18:00 +0100
      Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2016-11-07 18:20 +0100
        Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Mike Oliver <mike@mopmeat.net> - 2016-11-07 18:30 +0100
          Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Ozgur <okaratas@member.fsf.org> - 2016-11-07 20:00 +0100
        Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2016-11-07 20:00 +0100
    Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Richard Waterbeek <richardwbb@versatel.nl> - 2016-11-10 03:40 +0100
      Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Vladislav Kurz <vladislav.kurz@webstep.net> - 2016-11-10 10:30 +0100
        Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Richard Waterbeek <richardwbb@versatel.nl> - 2016-11-16 21:30 +0100
          Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2016-11-16 21:40 +0100
      Re: vulnerability in 8.6 advocatux <advocatux@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 10:50 +0100
        Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Tino <tinolin2010@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 14:00 +0100
    Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Richard Waterbeek <richardwbb@versatel.nl> - 2016-11-22 19:20 +0100
      Re: vulnerability in 8.6 Riku Valli <riku.valli@vallit.fi> - 2016-11-22 20:30 +0100

csiph-web