Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #174273
| From | Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question |
| Date | 2016-11-07 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sANa9-gv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sztdv-6nD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sztdv-6nD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAq3T-2rB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAsfn-3Ir-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sABC1-1bu-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
steve wrote on 11/06/16 20:47:
> Le 06-11-2016, à 10:43:58 +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz a écrit :
>
>> What is the output of
>>
>> aptitude -F "%p" '~o'
>
> gives an error (unknown command « ~o »)
>
Sorry, this should be
aptitude -F "%p" search '~o'
>> ? Seems to me, there are packages installed on your system that don't belong to
>> any architecture in sources.list ("obsolete").
>
> However, running aptitude in curses mode shows that I have 80 obsolete
> packages. But that still doesn't connect the dots, since as shown in my
> previous message, I had a total of 3507 installed package (with aptitude
> search) and 3349 (with dpkg). That's a difference of 158.
>
> But problem narrowed :)
The number of installed packages can be counted with aptitude as
aptitude search '~i' | wc -l
As others have explained the search with '~Astable$~i' does show packages which
are installed and are available in "stable" but maybe not with the same version
which is installed. Therefore, you probably counted some packages multiple.
Regards,
jvp.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2016-11-03 17:40 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2016-11-03 18:10 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-06 08:30 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2016-11-06 10:50 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-06 20:50 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2016-11-07 09:10 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-06 14:20 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-06 21:00 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 02:40 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-14 14:10 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-14 19:50 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2016-11-07 00:30 +0100
Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-14 14:20 +0100
RE:Package Ikeysis Walker <ikeysiswalker3@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 01:10 +0100
csiph-web