Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #174261

Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Steve,

Steve wrote:
> Thank you for your explanation, I understand a bit better the logic. But
> there is still something that doesn't quite match. Please consider the
> following.
[...]
> a=              aptitude search ~A[$a]~i | wc -l 					dpkg -l | grep ^ii | wc -l
> trusty                                    16
> jessie$                                    0
> jessie-backports                         248
> stable                                  3243
> TOTAL                                   3507                3349
> now                                     3349                3349
> 
> 
> so 3507 ≠ 3349. Both figures should be equal as I understand.

Nope.

There are packages where one version is in stable and another version
is in jessie-backports. Those are likely counted twice if any version
is installed, i.e. there are likely about 158 packages which are
either installed from backports and which are also available in stable
or vice versa.

Background is that even if you use ~A and ~i the same search term,
they don't necessarily match the same version of the package if
multiple versions of a package are available.

I don't know all the details by mind as I rather seldom run into
issues where this is relevant, but the details are explained on
https://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s04s03.html

Please also see the patterns ?all-versions(), ?any-version(),
?narrow() and ?widen() on
https://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s04s05.html

HTH.

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2016-11-03 17:40 +0100
  Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2016-11-03 18:10 +0100
  Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-06 08:30 +0100
    Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2016-11-06 10:50 +0100
      Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-06 20:50 +0100
        Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2016-11-07 09:10 +0100
    Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-06 14:20 +0100
      Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-06 21:00 +0100
        Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 02:40 +0100
          Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-14 14:10 +0100
            Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-14 19:50 +0100
    Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2016-11-07 00:30 +0100
      Re: [Aptitude-devel] aptitude ~A question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2016-11-14 14:20 +0100
    RE:Package Ikeysis Walker <ikeysiswalker3@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 01:10 +0100

csiph-web