Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #171199
| From | Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions |
| Date | 2016-08-17 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s7enT-5cy-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s73LP-6q3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s73Vw-6tw-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s745c-6M0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s79ex-1DG-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:38:50AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > This last link is from 2008. It does seem to be difficult, and only > accomplishable by a full dump, repartition and recovery. The latter > would not be a problem if a regular backup is being done. But I've no > knowldge about how tar handles an xfs filesystem. Ack the man page, its > agnostic as there is zero mention of the filesytem in use. > > I use amanda as the tar manager here but my nightly backups are rather > tiny compared to 13Tb, rarely exceeding 20 gigabytes for 4 machines. > > With my wrapper script, I can lose the main drive, and put in a new one, > and have it recovered to its state as of about 3am this morning in 4 or > 5 hours. Any transactions after that time would be lost but 98% of that > is email traffic. Non-commercial IOW. Using commodity 1T drives, I have > the last 30 days worth of amanda backups on one of them using virtual > tapes. Unlike a tape drive that always has to spend the winter holidays > in Oklahoma City getting rebuilt, I have random (fast) access to my > data. That drive is now about 4 years old, has had 25 re-allocated > sectors for much of that time, less than 50 power ups, and shows 45% > usage in a df -h report right now. Whats not to like? :) > > What does zfs do for one that ext4 can't that makes it attractive to use? ZFS has: - checksum of all data, so you can detect when you are reading data that wasn't what you wrote - if RAID is set up, correction of that data, including knowing which cop(ies) pass the checksum - built in snapshotting, faster and more efficient than LVM's version - built in send/receive - like dump, but with better than rsync efficiency - read and write caching for spinning disks can be done with SSDs, to provide a significant price/performance advantage for large storage. Of these, I guess the last one wouldn't be too interesting to you. -dsr-
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Decrease/increase XFS partitions ML mail <mlnospam@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-17 09:50 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 10:00 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-08-17 10:10 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-17 15:40 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-08-17 21:10 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-17 15:00 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-17 15:00 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-08-17 15:20 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-08-17 15:30 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-08-17 15:40 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-08-17 16:20 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-17 16:00 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-08-17 16:10 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-17 16:30 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 21:20 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-08-17 15:40 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-17 16:00 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-08-17 16:10 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-08-17 16:30 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2016-08-17 17:00 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-08-17 17:00 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-08-17 16:30 +0200
Re: Decrease/increase XFS partitions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 21:10 +0200
csiph-web