Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #3968
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.msdos.programmer |
| Subject | Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports |
| Date | 2021-04-26 11:42 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <s661tt$vvk$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <db363ce1-051e-4663-b2cb-e64a81a5d91bn@googlegroups.com> <s60jkf$11j5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <80bdb037-707d-4eac-b5f6-050f3d775761n@googlegroups.com> <s639fu$ag9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <08aa84aa-2c84-4013-821c-67e04b7b4ceen@googlegroups.com> |
Muta,
> Ok, 304 was difficult to see.
My apologies, I goofed up. You said 304, and I blabbered about 305. :-(
> Isn't this more a function of multitasking? Given that
> MSDOS wasn't multitasking, was there a problem?
No, its not multitasking. Its just, as the method says, interrupting the
program for a short(!) while. So, no problem for DOS.
And although DOS itself isn't multitasking, there where several programs dat
did do a nice job at faking it. IIRC DoubleDesk is one of them. I also
remember a helpfile program that would, inside the (flat text) editor of
your choice, pop up a window with searchable help context.
> The C standard requires you to do a seek before
> switching modes.
Than you should at least try if it works that way. :-)
Full disclosure : my language-of-choice is Assembly. Although I can do some
C{something}, my knowledge about it is meager.
> I want blocking I/O. I want the external "BBS" to
> deal with timeouts etc and provide a clean data
> stream to my applications running on PDOS/x86.
The problem with blocking I/O is, as you have probably already noticed, that
if you are waiting for something (to arrive or be (fully) send) you cannot
do anything else. And for some reason when humans press a key they
normally expect a direct response. :-)
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-23 16:19 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-04-23 18:26 -0600
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-23 18:47 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-04-23 20:08 -0600
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-23 20:40 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-04-23 20:14 -0600
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-24 10:07 +0200
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-24 15:04 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-25 10:32 +0200
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-26 01:32 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-26 11:42 +0200
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-26 04:42 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-26 14:54 +0200
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-26 14:10 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-27 11:40 +0200
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-27 03:56 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-05-01 21:56 +0200
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-05-01 14:36 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-05-02 10:29 +0200
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-05-02 02:14 -0700
Re: MSDOS 3.2 COM ports Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2021-04-28 14:15 +1000
csiph-web