Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #3952
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.msdos.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode |
| Date | 2021-04-20 08:56 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <s5ltv1$fc5$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <89b9bfdd-14c2-4a40-96b0-0c83f2bb6912n@googlegroups.com> <s5laqt$tu8$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> |
Grant, > I know that there are ways that you can run ad-hock commands through the > COM port. One of the most common I remember seeing was the method to get > INTERLNK / INTERSVR onto a computer that didn't have the necessary ... > But the point being the source computer was controlling the target > computer, and DOS thereon via the COM port. Alas, It didn't/doesn't (control DOS / the 'puter). Instead of that it just relies on redirection.of output / input (to/from file). Remember how you can do "dir > file.txt" ? Well, you can do the same with all kinds of in/output handles. The above method you mentioned was simply to redirect the output of the COM port to file (with a ".com" extension), and than execute that file. Mind you, that (received by COM) data has been rather specifically created to be able to be piped into a file and than executed that way. Definitily not "just" some executable (if you want to know more about it I suggest you ask for it in "comp.lang.asm.x86"). Bottom line : controlling the 'puter using just the COM port is *not* build into the OS. Even if you would be able to redirect the COM port as input to / output from the commandline there are just too many programs that use something else than plain (int 0x21) character reads-and-writes which will break it. Regards, Rudy Wieser
Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Ruud Baltissen <rbaltissen@gmail.com> - 2021-04-15 06:17 -0700
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-15 08:38 -0700
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode "muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2021-04-15 09:11 -0700
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-04-19 19:29 -0600
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-20 08:56 +0200
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-04-20 09:33 -0600
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-20 19:21 +0200
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-04-20 13:43 -0600
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-20 22:48 +0200
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2021-04-20 22:58 +0000
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Ruud Baltissen <rbaltissen@gmail.com> - 2021-04-27 23:13 -0700
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2021-04-28 11:01 -0600
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Mateusz Viste <mateusz@xyz.invalid> - 2021-04-29 08:11 +0200
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-28 20:37 +0200
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode Ruud Baltissen <rbaltissen@gmail.com> - 2021-04-28 22:47 -0700
Re: Running MS-DOS in terminal mode "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-04-29 09:11 +0200
csiph-web