Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1459902
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC |
| Date | 2016-08-10 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s4IBR-1DK-61@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s4GgI-79-107@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4Gqo-b4-111@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4Gqo-b4-109@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy |
On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 12:22 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 15:15 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 11:06 +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > dmatest on ARC SDP with DW DMAC became broken after df5c7386
> > > ("dmaengine: dw: some Intel devices has no memcpy support") and
> > > 30cb2639 ("dmaengine: dw: don't override platform data with
> > > autocfg")
> > > commits.
> > > * After df5c7386 commit "DMA_MEMCPY" capability option doesn't
> > > get set correctly in platform driver version.
> > > * After 30cb2639 commit
> > > "data_width" and "nollp" parameters don't get set correctly in
> > > platform
> > > driver version.
> > >
> > > This happens because in old driver version there are three
> > > sources
> > > of parameters: pdata, device tree and autoconfig hardware
> > > registers.
> > > Some parameters were read from pdata and others from autoconfig
> > > hardware registers. If pdata was absent some pdata structure
> > > fields were filled with parameters from device tree. But 30cb2639
> > > commit disabled overriding pdata with autocfg, so if we use
> > > platform
> > > driver version without pdata some parameters will not be set.
> >
> > Yes, that's correct behaviour right now. You have to provide
> > platform
> > code which registers device with all platform data provided.
>
> But given autocfg registers exist in HW why don't we rely on their
> contents?
And how exactly we can get that mem2mem support is absent / broken by
some reason?
All those quirks (bool is_*) kinda semi-hardware related.
What we can do is to have two categories of properties: a) genuine
hardware properties, and b) quirks.
So, refactor the ->probe() function in a way that will still copy quirks
and other non-hardware properties from platform data, if provided, to
the driver internals.
>
> >
> > >
> > > I'm wondering what would be the best way to fix this situation?
> >
> > Ideally we have to switch to use built-in device properties
> > (drivers/base/property.c) and platform code in your case has to
> > provide
> > properties.
>
> What do you mean saying "built-in device properties"?
> Setting pdata structure? In our particular case we use device tree
> for DW DMAC setup.
Providing device properties instead of platform data. Again see above.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com> - 2016-08-10 20:20 +0200
Re: dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> - 2016-08-10 20:30 +0200
Re: dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-08-10 22:50 +0200
Re: dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-08-10 20:50 +0200
csiph-web