Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #159297

Re: A small, slightly meta-, question

From Manfred <noname@add.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: A small, slightly meta-, question
Date 2021-03-11 16:04 +0100
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <s2dbik$19rp$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <7b7882ed-283a-46a1-b89e-df920bce7f34n@googlegroups.com> <s2a22r$sec$2@dont-email.me> <s2ce4a$b52$1@reader1.panix.com> <87im5ydkzv.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/11/2021 11:48 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> John Forkosh <forkosh@panix.com> writes:
> 
>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2021 09:18, Mark Bluemel wrote:
>>>> Is there any value in trying to understand Pete Olcott's posts?
>>>
>>> No. He is wrong. It's not difficult to prove that the halting problem
>>> cannot be solved, [...]
>>
>> And since this is comp.lang.c, here's a little C program to prove it
>> by contradiction (though it might equally as well be Fortran, etc).
>>     Suppose you claim to have a function  int ishalts(char *filename)
>> that reads a C program from filename and returns 1=the program in
>> filename eventually halts, 0=it never halts, and -1=filename doesn't
>> contain a valid C program (just so ishalts() is a total function
>> from all_possible_strings-->{1,0,-1} rather than a partial function).

[...]

> 
>      /* save this program in file doIhalt.c */
>      int main(void)
>      {
>         int ishalts(char *);
>         while (ishalts("doIhalt.c") == 1) continue;
>      }
> 
> again, just to remove as much extraneous detail as possible.
> 
>> So the program never halts if ishalts() claims that it eventually halts,
>> and it immediately halts if ishalts() claims it never halts.
>> Thus no such function ishalts() can exist with the claimed functionality.
>> (I saw this example somewhere, but don't recall where.)
> 
> I think I have as well.  The trouble is that using the file name to "tie
> the knot" is really a cheat.  Not a cheat in a bad way (the argument is
> sound and the conclusion is correct) but a student might well wonder if
> halting for C programs is due to the fact that programs can be put into
> named files, and other models, that don't have named files, would not be
> subject to the same argument.
> 

Interesting objection. However, for an "ishalts()" function to exist a 
necessary condition is that a program can be addressed by some 
identifier. Then the same logic applies by making use of such 
identifier, be it named file or anything else.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A small, slightly meta-, question Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2021-03-10 00:18 -0800
  Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-03-10 00:20 -0800
    Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2021-03-11 21:24 +0000
      Re: A small, slightly meta-, question om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) - 2021-03-15 14:40 +0200
  Re: A small, slightly meta-, question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-03-10 00:30 -0800
  Re: A small, slightly meta-, question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-10 10:04 +0100
    Re: A small, slightly meta-, question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-03-10 20:40 -0800
    Re: A small, slightly meta-, question John Forkosh <forkosh@panix.com> - 2021-03-11 06:42 +0000
      Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-03-11 10:48 +0000
        Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-03-11 16:04 +0100
          Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-03-11 21:57 +0000
        Re: A small, slightly meta-, question John Forkosh <forkosh@panix.com> - 2021-03-12 06:29 +0000
  Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-03-10 05:51 -0800
    Re: A small, slightly meta-, question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-10 16:03 +0100
  Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-03-10 15:50 +0100
    Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2021-03-10 17:53 +0300
      Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Dolores Filandro <dolfiland8@gmail.com> - 2021-03-13 18:49 -0800
    Re: A small, slightly meta-, question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-03-10 20:41 -0800
  Re: A small, slightly meta-, question Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2021-03-10 08:54 -0700
  Re: A small, slightly meta-, question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-03-14 19:33 -0700

csiph-web