Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1452902
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts |
| Date | 2016-08-01 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s17p7-61Z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s0XSN-8qj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s15Qm-4XD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s175L-5Vw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 00:04 +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> writes: [] > > These might be better without the automatic use of ret > > > > return !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_AC_IN) || > > !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_KEY_INT) || > > !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_WAKEUP); > Yeah, I thought about this when I made the patch. > > I supposed it was written this way so that a printk was easier to add, that's > why I didn't change the useless variable. > > I have no strong opinion about this, so if you think it's worth it I can make > the additional change. Hi Robert. Your choice. It was one of those, 'oh, bother' type of things but I think it's worth it for readability and consistency. cheers, Joe
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-07-31 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-07-31 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-08-01 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-01 00:30 +0200
csiph-web