Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus
Date	2016-05-16 15:20 +0200
Message-ID	<rzqBb-7x7-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <ryJwd-2VN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzg8Y-u7-287@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzjzH-2Ul-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzmxz-4JQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzqhQ-7bz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 02:58:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik wrote:

> > Even if I'd like to not have these in bus operations, the struct snd_ac97 had a
> > need for a 'caps', 'ext_id', ... fields for example. Yet these could be
> > contained in the ac97_codec_device structure and not exposed to bus operations.

> Do we have any example of such exceptions?  For AC97, we don't need to
> think of future extensions at all.

I can't think of any, even for some of the more fancy CODECs used in
embedded systems.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-05-14 12:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2016-05-14 17:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-05-16 04:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2016-05-16 07:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-05-16 11:00 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2016-05-16 15:00 +0200
            Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-05-16 15:20 +0200

csiph-web