Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1399669
| From | Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Disable restoring Rx interrupts for DMA Mode |
| Date | 2016-05-12 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rxR2O-7ar-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rxiy5-5Zu-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxNVg-3vp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:41:26PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 05/10, Abhishek Sahu wrote: > > From: Charanya <charanya@codeaurora.org> > > Was it intentional to only have one name here? > > > > > The Data loss was happening with current QCOM MSM serial driver during > > large file transfer due to simultaneous enabling of both UART and > > DMA interrupt. When UART operates in DMA mode, RXLEV (Rx FIFO over > > watermark) or RXSTALE (stale interrupts) should not be enabled, > > since these conditions will be handled by DMA controller itself. > > If these interrupts are enabled then normal UART ISR will read some > > bytes of data from Rx Buffer and DMA controller will not receive > > these bytes of data, which will cause data loss. > > > > Now this patch removed the code for enabling of RXLEV and RXSTALE > > interrupt in DMA Rx completion routine. > > I'm lost, we keep both these irqs masked (well only if uartdm > version is 1.4 or greater) pretty much the entire time we're > using DMA for RX. msm_start_rx_dma() will mask them and then when > the callback completes we'll unmask them (the part that's deleted > in this patch), but then we'll go back and remask them almost > immediately because we call msm_start_rx_dma() from the dma > completion handler. > > Can you clearly describe how this is actually fixing any > problems? What's the sequence of events that happens to cause > corruption? > > This does raise the question though why we ever mask/unmask these > interrupts if we're always going to keep them masked while doing > DMA RX. Presumably if we can use DMA to RX, we can always use it > and set things up properly at startup time instead of later on. Thats probably the right thing to do. We shouldn't be masking/unmasking the unused IRQs to begin with.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Disable restoring Rx interrupts for DMA Mode Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> - 2016-05-10 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Disable restoring Rx interrupts for DMA Mode Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-05-12 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Disable restoring Rx interrupts for DMA Mode Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2016-05-12 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Disable restoring Rx interrupts for DMA Mode charanya@codeaurora.org - 2016-05-13 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Disable restoring Rx interrupts for DMA Mode Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-05-26 00:50 +0200
csiph-web