Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #7559

Re: [OT] Genderangement [Was: Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types]

Show all headers | View raw

In article <97967kFoijU2@mid.individual.net>,
 blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <rubrum-1A1C0A.12535101072011@news.albasani.net>,
> Michael Press  <rubrum@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > In article <973v8pFgd2U1@mid.individual.net>,
> >  blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > In article <rubrum-BDFD75.10580530062011@news.albasani.net>,
> > > Michael Press  <rubrum@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > > In article <971k1mF5gbU4@mid.individual.net>,
> > > >  blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [ snip ]
> 
> > > > > > > E.S., I agree with your comments except for a minor quibble:
> > > > > > > there's no evidence in OP that pronouns 'he' and 'his' apply.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >      1) I'll stand by them, on the grounds that only a male could
> > > > > > be so foolhardy.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Defending yourself from an implied charge of gender bias by using
> > > > > gender stereotypes ....  "What's wrong with this picture?" ?
> > > > 
> > > > Nothing. It was funny; but I did not expect you to find it so.
> > > 
> > > Ah, but I did, at least mildly so.  Perhaps what I said at the end
> > > of my post (not quoted) -- a "what you said" in response to Eric's
> > > ":-)" -- didn't make that clear.
> > 
> > Not to me. :)
> 
> Okay.  I think in writing the initial post I thought about putting
> in a :-) at that point but decided not to.  Maybe next time!
> 
> > > Just sayin', not trying to be argumentative, but mildly curious about 
> > > how you come into the discussion.
> > 
> > "What's wrong with this picture?" as an appeal to others.
> 
> Oh.  Right.  I'm not sure I meant it that way, but okay.  I think
> I was also somewhat puzzled by your "I did not expect you to find it 
> so," which seems to me to suggest that I in particular ....  Not sure
> how to finish that sentence.  Not very important anyway!

Quite. To be clear, through the miracle of hindsight
I see that there were enough clues for me to not have
gone off the rails as I did.

-- 
Michael Press

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

| vs || operator on C99 bool types Matthias Arndt <marndt@asmsoftware.de> - 2011-06-27 16:21 +0000
  Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 13:38 -0400
  Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-27 21:51 -0400
    Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types James Waldby <not@valid.invalid> - 2011-06-28 16:16 +0000
      [OT] Genderangement [Was: Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types] Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-28 20:35 -0400
        Re: [OT] Genderangement [Was: Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types] blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 21:33 +0000
          Re: [OT] Genderangement [Was: Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types] Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-30 10:58 -0700
            Re: [OT] Genderangement [Was: Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types] blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-30 18:57 +0000
              Re: [OT] Genderangement [Was: Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types] Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-07-01 12:53 -0700
                Re: [OT] Genderangement [Was: Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types] blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 18:27 +0000
                Re: [OT] Genderangement [Was: Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types] Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-07-03 20:53 -0700
      Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-03 03:34 -0700
        Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-03 08:25 -0400
          Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types gordonb.pbl6v@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-07-03 18:23 -0500
  Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 07:21 -0400
    Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 08:24 -0400
      Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types Matthias Arndt <marndt@asmsoftware.de> - 2011-06-28 16:11 +0000
  Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-06-28 16:37 -0700
    Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-03 03:41 -0700
      Re: | vs || operator on C99 bool types Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-07-03 15:02 -0700

csiph-web