Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1390848
| From | Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5: hangs after a few minutes after boot |
| Date | 2016-04-29 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rtbER-2B9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rsgwV-4xy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Apr 26 Stefan Richter wrote: > v4.6-rc solidly hangs after a short while after boot, login to X11, and > doing nothing much remarkable on the just brought up X desktop. > > Hardware: x86-64, E3-1245 v3 (Haswell), > mainboard Supermicro X10SAE, > using integrated Intel graphics (HD P4600, i915 driver), > C226 PCH's AHCI and USB 2/3, ASMedia ASM1062 AHCI, > Intel LAN (i217, igb driver), > several IEEE 1394 controllers, some of them behind > PCIe bridges (IDT, PLX) or PCIe-to-PCI bridges (TI, Tundra) > and one PCI-to-CardBus bridge (Ricoh) > > kernel.org kernel, Gentoo Linux userland > > 1. known good: v4.5-rc5 (gcc 4.9.3) > known bad: v4.6-rc2 (gcc 4.9.3), only tried one time > > 2. known good: v4.5.2 (gcc 5.2.0) > known bad: v4.6-rc5 (gcc 5.2.0), only tried one time > > I will send my linux-4.6-rc5/.config in a follow-up message. After it proved impossible to capture an oops through netconsole, I started git bisect. This will apparently take almost a week, as git estimated 13 bisection steps and I will be allowing about 12 hours of uptime as a sign for a good kernel. (In my four or five tests of bad kernels before I started bisection, they hung after 3 minutes...5.5 hours uptime, with no discernible difference in workload. Maybe 12 h cutoff is even too short...) -- Stefan Richter -======----- -=-- ===-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5: hangs after a few minutes after boot Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> - 2016-04-29 10:10 +0200
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5: Merge tag 'drm-intel-next-2016-02-29' Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> - 2016-04-30 16:00 +0200
Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> - 2016-05-05 19:50 +0200
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - 2016-05-05 21:00 +0200
Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2016-05-05 22:00 +0200
Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> - 2016-05-06 01:00 +0200
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> - 2016-05-06 01:00 +0200
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - 2016-05-06 02:00 +0200
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> - 2016-05-08 12:20 +0200
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> - 2016-05-08 13:30 +0200
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2016-05-06 08:40 +0200
Re: Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW" Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> - 2016-05-08 13:50 +0200
csiph-web