Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1390563

Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Update dt binding document to use proper unit address

From "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@ti.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Update dt binding document to use proper unit address
Date 2016-04-28 23:50 +0200
Message-ID <rt1YS-2LF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rsjOa-7f9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsjOa-7f9-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rt1Pd-2H9-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 04/28/2016 04:31 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 05:36:44PM -0500, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>> Replace unit address from 0 to the proper physical address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
>> index 788da6c..1b7eec5 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
>> @@ -16,21 +16,21 @@ Optional properties:
>>  
>>  Example:
>>  
>> -ecap0: ecap@0 { /* ECAP on am33xx */
>> +ecap0: ecap@48300100 { /* ECAP on am33xx */
>>  	compatible = "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>>  	#pwm-cells = <3>;
>>  	reg = <0x48300100 0x80>;
>>  	ti,hwmods = "ecap0";
>>  };
>>  
>> -ecap0: ecap@0 { /* ECAP on am4372 */
>> +ecap0: ecap@48300100 { /* ECAP on am4372 */
>>  	compatible = "ti,am4372-ecap", "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>>  	#pwm-cells = <3>;
>>  	reg = <0x48300100 0x80>;
>>  	ti,hwmods = "ecap0";
>>  };
>>  
>> -ecap0: ecap@0 { /* ECAP on da850 */
>> +ecap0: ecap@1f06000 { /* ECAP on da850 */
>>  	compatible = "ti,da850-ecap", "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>>  	#pwm-cells = <3>;
>>  	reg = <0x306000 0x80>;
> 
> These still don't match.
> 
> Rob


I apologize you made a similar comment in the past but I misinterpreted
it recently which is why I made the same mistake again. I'll fix it.

Any issue with my response to your patch two comment for why I did
things the way I did? If so I can fix it when I send my new rev.

> 
>> -- 
>> 2.7.0
>>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Update dt binding document to  use proper unit address Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 23:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Update dt binding document to use  proper unit address "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@ti.com> - 2016-04-28 23:50 +0200

csiph-web