Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2334839
| From | Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
| Subject | Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" |
| Date | 2020-12-08 14:21 -0800 |
| Organization | Neodome |
| Message-ID | <rqou8v$2k5e$1@neodome.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ofidnYGFRuPHdVLCnZ2dnUU7-N3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <v_RzH.27221$7K1.22058@fx46.iad> <7fqdnZzlsu9oa1LCnZ2dnUU7-K3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 12/8/2020 1:58 PM, David Hartung wrote: > On 12/8/20 3:11 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 12/8/2020 12:55 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>> "over 'unlawful election results' in 2020 presidential race" >>> >>> [...] >>> Key Points >>> >>> Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton on Tuesday filed a lawsuit in >>> the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate presidential election results in >>> Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan. >>> >>> The lawsuit asserts that "unlawful election results" in those four states, >>> which President-elect Joe Biden won, should be declared unconstitutional. >>> >>> The filing argues that those states used the coronavirus pandemic as an >>> excuse to unlawfully change their election rules. >>> >>> Experts in election law were quick to dismiss the likelihood of the nine >>> Supreme Court justices taking the case. >>> [...] >>> >>> Hmm, this could be interesting. >> >> No, it's bullshit. > > Not necessarily, but you absolutely are. > >>> I feel it to be improper for one state to sue another for the manner in which >>> elections are conducted, but It also seems improper for the Court to refuse >>> to hear such a case. >> >> It's not. The Supreme Court declines lots of appeals. > > This is not an appeal, in suite between states, the Supreme Court has original > jurisdiction. IN other words, in this matter the suppreme Court is the trial court. > >> Texas has no standing. > > How do you fogure? > >> The claims in Texas’ lawsuit “are false and irresponsible,” Georgia’s deputy >> secretary of state, Jordan Fuchs, said in a fiery statement shortly after >> Paxton announced the legal action. >> >> “Texas alleges that there are 80,000 forged signatures on absentee ballots in >> Georgia, but they don’t bring forward a single person who this happened to. >> That’s because it didn’t happen,” Fuchs’ statement said. >> >> Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel called the suit a “publicity stunt” and >> “beneath the dignity” of Paxton’s office. Josh Kaul, the attorney general of >> Wisconsin, said in a statement the case was “genuinely embarrassing.” >> >> Experts in election law were also quick to dismiss the likelihood of the nine >> Supreme Court justices taking the case. Paul Smith, a professor at Georgetown >> University Law Center who has argued voting rights cases at the Supreme Court, >> said the case was “wacko.” >> >> “There is a whole system in Pennsylvania and the other states for contesting >> the election — that’s all been done,” said Smith, who also serves as vice >> president of litigation and strategy at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center. >> “I don’t think the Supreme Court will have interest in this.” >> >> The professor added that Texas could run into trouble in proving that it has >> grounds to sue, known in legal terms as “standing.” >> >> “It’s totally unprecedented, the idea that one state would, at the Supreme >> Court, claim that other states’ votes were cast in the wrong way — that’s >> never happened,” he said. “What is the injury to the state of Texas because >> Pennsylvania’s votes were cast for Mr. Biden instead of Mr. Trump? There is no >> connection there.” > > If Biden is elected due to illegally cast votes, He wasn't. > >> Rick Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California, Irvine, >> wrote on his popular legal blog that the suit was “utter garbage” and also >> disputed the idea that Texas had standing, noting that “it has no say over how >> other states choose electors.” > > Unless I missed something, You did, as always. > Texas is not complaining about how the elections were run, That's exactly their complaint.
Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-12-08 14:55 -0600
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> - 2020-12-08 13:11 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" BeamMeUpScotty <NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov> - 2020-12-08 16:26 -0500
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Bill Flett <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 13:33 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" AlleyCat <alleypussybitch@aohell.com> - 2020-12-08 14:20 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Byker <no_where@nada.not> - 2020-12-08 14:23 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Bud Dickmann <b_d@phil.con> - 2020-12-08 14:36 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" B1ackwater <bw@magikbeanz.net> - 2020-12-09 00:42 -0500
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Bill Flett <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 21:58 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2020-12-08 22:02 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2020-12-09 08:23 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Ubiquitous <webspermeater@polaris.net> - 2020-12-09 08:34 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Ken Paxton <kenpax@gmail.com> - 2020-12-09 17:16 +0000
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-12-08 15:58 -0600
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" PIBB <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-12-08 21:59 +0000
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" BeamMeUpScotty <NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov> - 2020-12-08 17:20 -0500
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Bill Flett <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 14:29 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-12-08 14:21 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-12-08 16:52 -0600
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-12-08 14:53 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-12-08 15:04 -0800
Trump Wins Again!: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" American Thinker <athinker@gopfags.net> - 2020-12-08 23:28 +0000
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> - 2020-12-08 15:06 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> - 2020-12-08 13:13 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> - 2020-12-08 13:18 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" BeamMeUpScotty <NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov> - 2020-12-08 16:29 -0500
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Bill Flett <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 13:34 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-12-08 13:18 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> - 2020-12-08 15:37 -0600
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" PIBB <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-12-08 21:58 +0000
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-12-08 16:22 -0600
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Bill Flett <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 14:23 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Jonathan <LSA@UMich.edu> - 2020-12-08 18:06 -0500
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> - 2020-12-08 15:07 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-12-08 17:10 -0600
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> - 2020-12-08 15:11 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-12-08 15:16 -0800
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Jonathan <LSA@UMich.edu> - 2020-12-08 18:45 -0500
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" PIBB <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-12-09 16:24 +0000
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2020-12-09 12:54 -0600
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" PIBB <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-12-09 20:00 +0000
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2020-12-11 22:46 -0700
Re: "Texas sues four battleground states in Supreme Court" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2020-12-11 22:46 -0700
csiph-web