Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #166728
| From | Nemeth Gyorgy <friczy@freemail.hu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: VPN over IPv6 |
| Date | 2016-04-15 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ro5A6-728-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ro0h4-2BJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ro0TL-3bX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ro2sx-4yR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2016-04-15 05:09 keltezéssel, Philippe Clérié írta: > By now, I suspect most IPv4 networks use private addresses, i.e. > 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/16, 192.168.0.0/24. So, it makes sense to have a > VPN between two different networks with such addresses so that they can > communicate. > > With IPv6, every* address is routable over the internet, and there is > no equivalent set of private addresses like the above. Therefore any two > IPv6 networks should be directly accessible to each other, obviating the > need for VPN or NAT for that matter. VPN is not about private ranges. > > Plus IPv6 is already encrypted. IPv6 has encryption capabilities but not mandatory. -- --- Friczy --- 'Death is not a bug, it's a feature'
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
VPN over IPv6 Philippe Clérié <philippe@gcal.net> - 2016-04-15 03:00 +0200
Re: VPN over IPv6 John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-15 03:40 +0200
Re: VPN over IPv6 Philippe Clérié <philippe@gcal.net> - 2016-04-15 05:20 +0200
Re: VPN over IPv6 Nemeth Gyorgy <friczy@freemail.hu> - 2016-04-15 08:40 +0200
Re: VPN over IPv6 Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 13:10 +0200
Re: VPN over IPv6 Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-04-15 03:40 +0200
csiph-web