Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1370447

Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async

From Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async
Date 2016-04-04 10:40 +0200
Message-ID <rk8db-mW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rgfGi-4EY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgfGi-4EY-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <riINQ-451-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu 31-03-16 13:12:29, Petr Mladek wrote:
> >  #if defined CONFIG_PRINTK
> > +static int printk_kthread_func(void *data)
> > +{
> > +	while (1) {
> > +		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > +		if (!need_flush_console)
> > +			schedule();
> > +
> > +		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> 
> 
> We still must do here:
> 
> 		need_flush_console = false;
> 
> Othrerwise, we might start "busy" cycling. cosole_unlock()
> sometimes returns earlly, e.g. when console_suspended is set
> or !can_use_console() returns true.
> 
> Sigh, the handling of "need_flush_console" is a bit strange.
> Part of the logic depends on logbuf_lock and the other part
> must be lockless.

Frankly, I think we are overcomplicating this. What we really need to detect
in printk_kthread_func() is whether someone appended something to the console
since we woken up. Sure, console_unlock() may have already printed that
and we would unnecessarily make one more loop over console_lock() and
console_unlock() but who cares...

So what about having printk_kthread_func() like:

	while (1) {
		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
		if (!need_flush_console)
			schedule();
		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
		need_flush_console = false;
		console_lock();
		console_unlock();
	}

In vprintk_emit() we do:

	if (!in_panic && printk_kthread) {
		/* Offload printing to a schedulable context. */
		need_flush_console = true;
		wake_up_process(printk_kthread);
	} else {
		...

This guarantees that after message was appended to the buffer in
vprintk_emit(), the message got either printed by console_unlock() or
printk_kthread is in TASK_RUNNING state and will call console_unlock() once
scheduled. It also guarantees that printk_kthread_func() won't loop forever
when there's nothing to print. And that is all we need...

I think the simplicity of this is worth the possible extra loops in
printk_kthread_func().

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC][PATCH v8 0/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 16:50 +0100
  [RFC][PATCH v8 2/2] printk: Make wake_up_klogd_work_func() async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 16:50 +0100
    Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 2/2] printk: Make wake_up_klogd_work_func() async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-03-31 13:20 +0200
  [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 16:50 +0100
    Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-03-29 11:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 03:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-03-31 13:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 03:10 +0200
        Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-04-01 11:00 +0200
          Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 11:40 +0200
            Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-04-01 13:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-04-04 10:40 +0200
        Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-04-04 11:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC][PATCH v8 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 18:10 +0200

csiph-web