Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1370315
| From | Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit |
| Date | 2016-04-04 01:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rjZWh-2AR-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rj29Q-1bH-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rj2jw-1v4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rjdHY-15p-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:14:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:03:50 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri 01-04-16 17:00:58, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > [...]
> > > [2] commit 5acbd3bfc93b ("mm, oom: rework oom detection")
> >
> > I didn't look a tht patch yet but wanted to note that this sha is most
> > probably from linux-next and won't be stable. Also this patch will most
> > likely see some changes in future so making changes on top which should
> > go in independetly will likely just complicate things.
>
> Yes, we'll need two patches please. One to fix 6b4f7799c6a5 ("mm:
> vmscan: invoke slab shrinkers from shrink_zone()") (which is in
> mainline) and a second to clean up -mm's "mm, oom: rework oom detection".
Andrew, Michal
Thanks. I just sent out it as separate patch.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-04-01 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 01:50 +0200
csiph-web