Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1366895
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Update][PATCH v7 6/7] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching |
| Date | 2016-03-30 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rigye-Aq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rfjLX-5N2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfjLX-5N2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ridqF-6vA-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 30-03-16, 03:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -843,6 +883,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct
> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
>
> if (data) {
> + policy->fast_switch_possible = false;
Is this done just for keeping code symmetric or is there a logical advantage
of this? Just for my understanding, not saying that it is wrong.
Otherwise, it looks good
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-22 03:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-03-26 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-26 02:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-27 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-03-28 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-29 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-28 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-29 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-28 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-29 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-29 16:30 +0200
[Update][PATCH v7 6/7] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-30 03:50 +0200
Re: [Update][PATCH v7 6/7] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-30 07:10 +0200
Re: [Update][PATCH v7 6/7] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-30 13:30 +0200
csiph-web