Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #532426
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Mathematician claims breakthrough in complexity theory |
| Date | 2015-11-12 19:40 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <rh6fhc-fu2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <Ye2dneuJ5rhzNdnLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <4s4fhc-ei2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >> Mathematician claims breakthrough in complexity theory >>> http://news.sciencemag.org/math/2015/11/mathematician-claims-breakthrough-complexity-theory >>> http://news.sciencemag.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumb_article_l/public/sn-isomorphism.jpg? >> >> >>> For days, rumors about the biggest advance in years in so-called >>> complexity theory have been lighting up the Internet. That?s only >>> fitting, as the breakthrough involves comparing networks just like >>> researchers? webs of online connections. L?szl? Babai, a >>> mathematician and computer scientist at the University of Chicago in >>> Illinois, has developed a mathematical recipe or "algorithm" that >>> supposedly can take two networks?no matter how big and tangled?and >>> tell whether they are, in fact, the same, in far fewer steps than the >>> previous best algorithm. Computer scientists are abuzz, as the task >>> had been something of a poster child for hard-to-solve problems. >>> >>> "If this is correct it's probably the theoretical computer science >>> result of the decade," says Scott Aaronson, a computer scientist and >>> blogger at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. >>> >>> Complexity theory is basically the study of what's hard or easy to >>> solve with a computer. In it, the key thing is how the number of >>> steps it takes to solve a problem grows with the size of the input. >>> Suppose, for example, that you want to determine whether a given >>> number, 983 or 105227, is prime and cannot be divided by another >>> number. The number of computational steps in that calculation grows >>> relatively slowly with the number of digits in the number. Generally, >>> it grows with the number of digits, n, raised to a fixed >>> power?something akin to n^2. Expressions like that are called >>> polynomials, so the problem is said to be solvable in "polynomial >>> time" and is in the complexity class ?P.? > > This cut and paste might have been of interest had it been posted to > a mathematics group, but it was not. Holy shit, it WAS crossposted to a relevant group, this is utterly mind boggling. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mathematician claims breakthrough in complexity theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 08:57 -0600
Re: Mathematician claims breakthrough in complexity theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 19:11 +0000
Re: Mathematician claims breakthrough in complexity theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 19:40 +0000
csiph-web