cadaver vs davfs2 (vs nautilus) on servers without collection resource

From	Wim Bertels <wim.bertels@ucll.be>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	cadaver vs davfs2 (vs nautilus) on servers without collection resource
Date	2016-03-25 11:40 +0100
Message-ID	<rgxjP-hw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization	UC Leuven-Limburg

Show all headers | View raw

Hallo,

i tried to connect to an https enabled dav server (that runs on
microsoft for synchronisation they suggest:
Allway Sync (http://www.allwaysync.com/)
BestSync (http://www.risefly.com/)
GoodSync (http://www.goodsync.com/))

* First use case: Nautilus
Fails, no folders found
* Second use case: cadaver
Fails at the first attempt, but works with the -t option
eg (cadaver -t https://site.here/hcwebdav/ )
Interesting message with the -t option:
"
Ignored error: /hcwebdav/ not WebDAV-enabled:
Did not find a collection resource.
"
* Third use case: davfs2
Seems to work, but when entering the directory it is empty, so useless,
no errors are given.

Questions:
* can you use cadaver in some way/workaround as a 'normal' mount point,
not having to use the cadaver interface?
* can you use commands like rsync, unison on a dav share?
* if cadaver works, is it possible to get davfs2 to work?

mvg,
Wim

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

cadaver vs davfs2 (vs nautilus) on servers without collection  resource Wim Bertels <wim.bertels@ucll.be> - 2016-03-25 11:40 +0100

csiph-web