Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #29948
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Group Design |
| Date | 2020-08-10 15:43 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <rgrit7$p67$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <rgi24o$1has$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cc6f131d-e8e7-387a-fe5e-907478e75062@electrooptical.net> <rgje0v$g3r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <d4cc06b3-19de-5e99-d7a3-3b262fe04b7b@electrooptical.net> <rgkojs$d7v$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 08/08/2020 01:37, Chris wrote: > On 08/07/20 14:57, Phil Hobbs wrote: > >> I know it isn't what the cool kids do, but that doesn't make it >> unreliable or cause it to fail safety inspections AFAICT. Medical may be >> different, but it would pass UL with no issues. What regulations nwould >> you expect it to fall foul of? >> >> Cheers >> >> Phil Hobbs >> > > It's not the regulations, as afaics approvals are more concerned with > *process*, how the design decisons were made and why. Would not > necessarily catch design errors that resulted in a regulator running > near it's design limit, though avionics or mil temperature cycle > testing might cause a failure because of lack of margin for a device. > > Whatever you might think, it's well known that high temperatures and > cycling shortens the life of electronics and no, I don't have > references,but it's all on the web. Some prefer to skimp every penny, > others prefer conservative design rules. It's the difference between > consumer electronics and pro kit. may look like the same parts, but > the design tradeoffs are different. Engineering design is always an > approximation and compromise: performance, cost, reliability, pick any > two... > > Chris > I think it's fair to say that this 70 C case with poor thermal contact with the board is an indicator of bad design - bad schematic design (using a linear regulator rather than a switch mode), and bad layout design (poor cooling). And poor design in such an obvious case suggests poor design overall - which is not going to go well for any kind of safety requirements or regulations where the design process is considered. It is also correct to say that the reliability of a system is a function of the reliability of all the parts, and that high temperatures and temperature cycling shorten lifetimes and increase the rate of failures. But you can't say how significant this particular part would be without a lot more information about the rest of the system. As Phil says, a part rated for 125 C is not going to see much increased failure risk at 70 C compared to 50 C. But if it sits next to a part that is rated to 85 C and the final system is mounted in a closed box and used in the Qatar summer, perhaps it will have a relevant effect. All in all, this looks like a rush job put together by people with no experience with high reliability or safety-related systems. That's the general problem, rather than one particular hot regulator.
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 18:46 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-07 19:02 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 20:36 -0700
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-08 09:31 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:08 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 14:13 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:19 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 18:57 +0200
Re: Group Design Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2020-07-08 18:28 +0100
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 23:34 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 15:20 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-08 23:00 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-10 10:09 +0200
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-07 00:01 +0100
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 03:06 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 21:50 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 19:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 22:27 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 19:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 23:39 -0400
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-07 12:30 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 09:57 -0400
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-08 00:37 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 20:29 -0400
Re: Group Design upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-08-08 08:59 +0300
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-10 15:43 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-10 09:18 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 07:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-08 00:00 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 20:30 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:57 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:56 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 18:10 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 19:43 -0700
Re: Group Design Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-08-07 20:42 +0300
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 13:48 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-08 14:11 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-07-09 04:25 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Group Design Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2020-07-09 20:02 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-07-09 15:31 -0400
Re: Group Design lasselangwadtchristensen@gmail.com - 2020-07-09 15:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 18:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-07-10 16:17 +1000
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 23:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-10 10:22 +0200
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-09 14:40 +0200
Re: Group Design John Speth <johnspeth@yahoo.com> - 2020-07-09 07:59 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 18:33 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 19:01 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 22:32 -0700
Re: Group Design George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-07-10 17:36 -0400
Re: Group Design Ed Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2020-07-14 11:09 -0700
Re: Group Design George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-07-16 00:26 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 22:48 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 23:53 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-10 01:15 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-10 02:22 -0700
csiph-web