Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #29925
| From | Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Group Design |
| Date | 2020-08-08 00:00 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <rgkmep$1p70$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <041d35fe-f5a5-4b7a-a78b-291104e34220o@googlegroups.com> <rgi24o$1has$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cc6f131d-e8e7-387a-fe5e-907478e75062@electrooptical.net> <rgje0v$g3r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <92461a49-9c5d-414d-b3f3-e98ec68b974bo@googlegroups.com> |
On 08/07/20 15:12, Rick C wrote: > > Efficiency may be personally important to an engineer who wants to overdesign everything, but this device has a 2 amp motor running off the 15 volts and it is all line powered, so no need to squeeze every last joule out of the design. We are measuring some low level signals that could easily be disrupted by the switching currents. So adding that type of a noise source would only be done if actually required. > > Oddly enough most of the power used in the electronics other than the motor are in the LED back lights for the low power LCD displays. I have thought of using a switcher for them, but even at the 250 mA power level it's just not worth the hassle of dealing with the noise. > > Hmmm... maybe that is a bigger impact than anyone here is thinking. The display is on all the time. The motor only runs at high power about half the time. So it's really more like 1 amp. Now the ratio is more like 4:1. We don't have good data on the motor current, so no one has paid attention to the battery time. > > There are so many holes in this net. lol > > BTW, does anyone understand what Phil Hobbs is going on about??? Why does he talk in code? > If you are switching a 2 amp motor load, then you already have more problems than a point of use regulator, in terms of supply load step function. If it's a dc brush motor, perhaps permanent magnet, that looks like little more than 0 ohms, or nearly a short circuit at rest, so you will need to ramp that up to limit current. Once spun up, power is more or less proportional to load, but unless the data sheet has all the info, you will need to build a mechanical test rig to define the motor characteristics. I would do that anyway, to get a idea of what size motor is needed and optimise the circuit to drive it. There's quite range of ic's for motor control, with soft start, current limiting etc. You could perhaps use a brushless moter and again, some ic choice on how that's done. Advantage is zero commutator noise to upset other things. You really can't just use a relay to switch that motor. > BTW, does anyone understand what Phil Hobbs is going on about??? Why does he talk in code? Iirc, if he will excuse the comment, Phil is a scientist, Science is about math and numbers, measurement accuracy, whereas electronics, once you get the theory under the belt, as more about experience, knowing what works, what doesn't and not a little intuition... Chris
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 18:46 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-07 19:02 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 20:36 -0700
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-08 09:31 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:08 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 14:13 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:19 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 18:57 +0200
Re: Group Design Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2020-07-08 18:28 +0100
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 23:34 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 15:20 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-08 23:00 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-10 10:09 +0200
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-07 00:01 +0100
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 03:06 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 21:50 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 19:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 22:27 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 19:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 23:39 -0400
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-07 12:30 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 09:57 -0400
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-08 00:37 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 20:29 -0400
Re: Group Design upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-08-08 08:59 +0300
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-10 15:43 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-10 09:18 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 07:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-08 00:00 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 20:30 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:57 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:56 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 18:10 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 19:43 -0700
Re: Group Design Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-08-07 20:42 +0300
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 13:48 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-08 14:11 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-07-09 04:25 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Group Design Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2020-07-09 20:02 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-07-09 15:31 -0400
Re: Group Design lasselangwadtchristensen@gmail.com - 2020-07-09 15:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 18:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-07-10 16:17 +1000
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 23:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-10 10:22 +0200
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-09 14:40 +0200
Re: Group Design John Speth <johnspeth@yahoo.com> - 2020-07-09 07:59 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 18:33 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 19:01 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 22:32 -0700
Re: Group Design George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-07-10 17:36 -0400
Re: Group Design Ed Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2020-07-14 11:09 -0700
Re: Group Design George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-07-16 00:26 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 22:48 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 23:53 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-10 01:15 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-10 02:22 -0700
csiph-web