Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #29922
| From | Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Group Design |
| Date | 2020-08-07 20:42 +0300 |
| Organization | TGI |
| Message-ID | <rgk3q9$o2f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <nnd$10d6570d$45c5d306@c70ced0050c4d383> <041d35fe-f5a5-4b7a-a78b-291104e34220o@googlegroups.com> <rgi24o$1has$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cc6f131d-e8e7-387a-fe5e-907478e75062@electrooptical.net> <rgje0v$g3r$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 8/7/2020 14:30, Chris wrote: > On 08/07/20 02:50, Phil Hobbs wrote: >> On 2020-08-06 19:01, Chris wrote: >>> On 07/08/20 23:20, Rick C wrote: >>> >>>> I'm also concerned about the board layout. The board is not at all >>>> dense but there are several >>> >>> parts that need copper area for heat sinking. They are using a linear >>> regulator to drop 12+ volts >>> >>> to 5V and 3.3V. The back lights for the LCDs draw 300 mA! So the 5V >>> regulator gets quite warm, >>> >>> 70°C!!! >>> >>> You should be concerned. The whole thing about safety critical kit is >>> that it should be conservatively designed, with all parts running well >>> within their ratings. If the hw bod is happy with a regulator running >>> at 70c, he must be clueless. Sorry, but it needs to be said. >>> >>> If you care about your professional career and any litigation >>> issues, you should either have enough influence on the project >>> direction to stop design errors like that, or just walk away from it... >>> >>> Chris >> >> Hmm, interesting. Most linear regulators I'm familiar with are rated to >> 125 C junction temperature, and some higher. What safety or regulatory >> issues have you run into that were caused by running some part 55C below >> its rated temperature? >> >> Cheers >> >> Phil Hobbs >> > > That's not the point and reliability is affected by temperature. It may > not matter for a short lived down hole item where failure has no safety > implications, but not good enough otherwise. The constant temperature > cycling will affect wire bonds and reliability. Cheap tacky design, > using a linear regulator to go from 12v to 5, then 3.3, considerable > current, where a point of use switcher would be a far more efficient and > probably more reliable solution as well Wasted power needs a bigger > backup battery etc... > > Chris > > A 7805 at 70C is not too hot, nothing like that. I'd be worried of any nearby electrolytic capacitors, I have seen these fail if put too close to some hot part. Once on a product of mine - though the board was "too hot" only for one cap of a particular series, other units have worked for well over 5 years 24/7. And once I repaired our TV set (some 15+ years ago, a CRT one), it had an electrolytic cap next to a "red" hot 7805. I have *never* seen a 78xx regulator fail because of overheating and I have designed in quite a few. One can have them run hot within reason, just keep in mind that they have temperature protection and if you overheat one it will protect itself by more or less cutting off the power at its output. Another thing to keep in mind is to not forget to put a diode in parallel if the output voltage is > say 5-6V; they do die if the input goes 0V or so with the output capacitor charged. Dimiter ====================================================== Dimiter Popoff, TGI http://www.tgi-sci.com ====================================================== http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 18:46 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-07 19:02 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 20:36 -0700
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-08 09:31 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:08 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 14:13 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:19 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 18:57 +0200
Re: Group Design Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2020-07-08 18:28 +0100
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-08 23:34 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 15:20 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-08 23:00 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-10 10:09 +0200
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-07 00:01 +0100
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 03:06 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 21:50 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 19:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 22:27 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-06 19:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-06 23:39 -0400
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-07 12:30 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 09:57 -0400
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-08 00:37 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 20:29 -0400
Re: Group Design upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-08-08 08:59 +0300
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-10 15:43 +0200
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-10 09:18 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 07:12 -0700
Re: Group Design Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-08-08 00:00 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-08-07 20:30 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:57 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 17:56 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 18:10 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 19:43 -0700
Re: Group Design Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-08-07 20:42 +0300
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 13:48 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-08 14:11 -0700
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-07-09 04:25 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Group Design Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Group Design Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2020-07-09 20:02 +0100
Re: Group Design Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-07-09 15:31 -0400
Re: Group Design lasselangwadtchristensen@gmail.com - 2020-07-09 15:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 18:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-07-10 16:17 +1000
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 23:36 -0700
Re: Group Design Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2020-07-10 10:22 +0200
Re: Group Design David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-09 14:40 +0200
Re: Group Design John Speth <johnspeth@yahoo.com> - 2020-07-09 07:59 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 18:33 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 19:01 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 22:32 -0700
Re: Group Design George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-07-10 17:36 -0400
Re: Group Design Ed Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2020-07-14 11:09 -0700
Re: Group Design George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-07-16 00:26 -0400
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 22:48 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-09 23:53 -0700
Re: Group Design Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-10 01:15 -0700
Re: Group Design Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-07-10 02:22 -0700
csiph-web